Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Cap on lifetime care costs only tinkers around edges, say critics

 

Oliver Wright
Monday 11 February 2013 12:16 GMT
Comments
Millions of working Britons will need to take out insurance to pay for their care in old age in addition to saving for a pension, under government plans
Millions of working Britons will need to take out insurance to pay for their care in old age in addition to saving for a pension, under government plans (Rex Features)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Pensioners’ leaders tonight condemned the Government’s plans to limit care home bills for the elderly as “tinkering around the edges” of much-needed change.

The Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt confirmed plans to cap the potential lifetime cost of nursing care at £75,000 with only pensioners with assets of more than £123,000 paying anything towards their care at all. But thousands more people will be hit with inheritance tax bills to pay for the policy because of a three-year extension of the freeze in the £325,000 threshold – £650,000 for couples – at a rate of 40 per cent.

Mr Hunt said the measures would end the “unfairness” of pensioners being forced to sell their homes to pay for care and would allow people to take out insurance to cover the £75,000 maximum outlay. However, Labour suggested that the measures did not go far enough and questioned why the Government had not accepted the recommendations put forward by the independent Commission chaired by the economist Andrew Dilnot to impose a £35,000 limit on care costs.

Mr Dilnot himself said he regretted that the cap had been set at £75,000 but insisted it would mean that pensioners no longer had to be “terrified” of the consequences of needing care. “We said it should be between £25,000 and £50,000 in 2010/11 prices. The cap that is being proposed is £75,000 [at] 2017 prices,” he said.

“That’s the equivalent of £61,000 in our terms, so it is higher than we would have wanted – £11,000 higher than the top end of our range and I regret that but I recognise that the public finances are in a pretty tricky state”. However, the National Pensioners Convention described the reforms as “about as credible as a Findus Lasagne”.

NPC general secretary Dot Gibson said: “The social care system needs urgent and radical reform, but these proposals simply tinker at the edges. Setting a lifetime cap on care costs of £75,000 will help just 10 per cent of those needing care, whilst the majority will be left to struggle on with a third rate service.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in