Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Ed Balls: Tory tax plans are 'social engineering'

Joe Churcher,Pa
Sunday 17 January 2010 10:04 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Tory plans to give married couples a tax break were attacked as "social engineering" by a Cabinet minister as the Government prepared to unveil a series of family-friendly policies.

Schools Secretary Ed Balls laid into David Cameron's pledge to recognise marriage financially, warning it would create a tier of "second class" families that risked stigmatising children.

Extra cash for the Relate service and a duty on public services to prioritise families were reported to be among measures to be promised by ministers in a Green Paper next week.

It will also include efforts to give more support to fathers, including a 10-page "New Dad's Guide" and new guidance to midwives on how to better engage with fathers.

As Labour drew battle lines with the Opposition on the issue, Mr Balls told the Sunday Telegraph it was vital for the state to recognise that good families came "in all shapes and sizes".

"The idea of trying to socially engineer family life through a tax policy which is designed to say that some types of families are first class, and other types of families are second class and should be financially disadvantaged, is hugely expensive and unfair," he said.

"The idea that you say to children who only have one parent because of bereavement or domestic violence, or to kids who have two parents, both of whom are divorced and who have a new family but don't want to or can't remarry that somehow you're not as good as another type of family is unfair.

"It could stigmatise children and I don't think that's right. I don't think children should be told they are second-class kids because of things which have happened through no fault of their own or unavoidable reasons."

Mr Balls, the husband of Work and Pensions Secretary Yvette Cooper, said he believed marriage remained "the best way to bring up children" but it was wrong to penalise other family units.

"Marriage has been and still is the most important institution for making sure we have strong and stable families. But sometimes things go wrong and marriages end. You end up with divorce, cohabitation, widowhood and single parents too," he said.

"Families come in all shapes and sizes these days but the evidence is clear - strong stable relationships between adults in the home, parents and grandparents, have the biggest impact on whether children are progressing and doing well."

Mr Cameron was forced to renew his promise to deliver the tax break "within a Parliament" last week after appearing to downgrade the commitment to a "hope".

He later issued a statement saying that the party was, in fact, pledged to deliver on the policy in its first term and said he had "messed up" by "misdescribing" the position.

Shadow chief secretary to the Treasury Philip Hammond defended the policy.

"Creating a framework of support for families is something that a strong and confident society should do, and that includes recognition of marriage in the tax system, respecting the importance of extended families, and acknowledging the value that stable families bring to our communities.

"There is plenty of evidence that being brought up in a stable family unit is one of the most important indicators of a child's future prospects. So encouraging stable families is a key tool in the fight against intergenerational poverty," he told the newspaper.

Mr Balls and Health Secretary Andy Burnham are to host a summit of health visitors, midwives and charities next week in an effort to increase the involvement of new fathers in their child's birth and early years.

It is a response to research showing those that were involved early on were "far more likely" to remain engaged - with significant advantages to the youngster's development.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in