Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Donald Macintyre’s Sketch: If a tax poacher can turn gamekeeper, can a leopard change its spots?

If there’s one thing Ms Hodge likes less than tax avoidance, its question avoidance

Donald Macintyre
Monday 28 October 2013 23:11 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Perhaps the most radioactive moment in Monday’s often acerbic and – thanks to The Independent’s campaign against tax scams – rich confrontation came when Margaret Hodge asked Edward Troup, Her Majesty’s tax assurance commissioner, if he had once written that “taxation is legalised extortion”.

Well, said Mr Troup, with polite defensiveness, he was gratified that people had read old articles of his in the Financial Times, in which those words had “appeared.” (Ms Hodge, who is sometimes reminded of her own history as the firebrand leader of the leftist Islington Council, interjected: “You can never get away from your past, I can tell you.”)

It was – of course – all a matter of “context”. The article had argued that tax was not a matter for “discretion of the tax authorities” but had to be “left to the rule of law”.

Poachers turned gamekeepers are an old story, and at the time Mr Troup was back working at the top firm which had originally employed him as a tax lawyer. But was he just a little too sympathetic with the poachers he was supposed to be catching? Ms Hodge mused: “I would never dream of using those four words together.” Before going on to ask Mr Troup whether “given those views, are you really the best person to lead the fight, the people’s fight against tax avoidance?”

The exchange went to the heart of the committee’s frustration, as with the fact that the £35bn 2011-12 “tax gap” – between what the HMRC actually raised and what it could raise if everyone paid up – did not even include the global dodges by which Amazon, Google and others pay such negligible corporation tax.

But MPs also focused on the practice, highlighted in this newspaper, by which UK companies manage to borrow money from wholly owned overseas outfits in offshore tax havens, and claim the interest as a tax deduction.

There had been a net loss of £4bn this way up to 2011, admitted Jim Harra, the director-general of business tax. But, protested Ian Swales MP, it was only after 2011 that this had been done on an “industrial scale”. Everyone was at it, including newspapers (apart from The Independent, which was “why they’re the ones doing these articles.”)

Ms Hodge was in her most “just answer yes or no” mood. If there’s one thing the committee likes less than tax avoidance, it’s question avoidance. But it usually gets there in the end.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in