Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

David Cameron to warn Vladimir Putin would be the winner from Brexit

Prime Minister expected to echo a warning by shadow Foreign Secretary Hilary Benn over effects of withdrawing from EU

Andrew Grice
Thursday 11 February 2016 19:32 GMT
Comments
David Cameron welcomes Vladimir Putin to the G8 Summit in Northern Ireland in June 2013. The PM comes close to saying Russia’s president would welcome a Brexit vote
David Cameron welcomes Vladimir Putin to the G8 Summit in Northern Ireland in June 2013. The PM comes close to saying Russia’s president would welcome a Brexit vote (PA)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The campaign to keep Britain in the EU is to argue that Vladimir Putin would be the winner if the public votes to leave the 28-nation bloc in the coming referendum.

David Cameron is expected to echo a warning by Labour that the Russian President would welcome a decision by Britain to withdraw from the EU. A Downing Street source said: “Who would most love to see Britain leave the EU? President Putin. He would see it as a sign that Europe is falling apart.”

National security, including standing up to Russian aggression and co-operation on crime and terrorism, is seen by pro-Europeans as a way to neutralise the impact of the migration crisis, which is thought likely to boost the Out campaign. Some pro-Europeans believe they could then win the referendum on the economic benefits of membership.

Hilary Benn, the shadow Foreign Secretary, was accused by Eurosceptics of scaremongering after saying in a speech on Thursday: “President Putin would shed no tears if Britain left the European Union. He would see Brexit as a sign of our weakness and of the weakness of European solidarity at the very moment when we need to maintain our collective strength.”

Speaking to the Chatham House think tank, Mr Benn cited Europe’s co-ordinated response to Russia's aggression in Crimea and Ukraine. He argued: “Our national security is served by both our membership of NATO and of the EU. To walk away from our membership and leadership of the EU would be a grave strategic error because Britain’s role in promoting international peace and security around the globe is greatly enhanced by being part of Europe."

But Matthew Elliott, chief executive of Vote Leave, said: "Pro-EU campaigners cannot make a positive case for remaining in a political project that is incapable of dealing with the challenges of the 21st century. Instead of accepting that we need a new relationship with the EU, they are whipping up fear about dictators and economic doom despite the fact that neither are remotely credible. Voting Leave is the safe option as it will allow us to make our own trade deals, end the supremacy of EU law and invest in our priorities."

Mike Hookem, Ukip’s defence spokesman, said: "Putin would be more scared of Britain leaving the EU and regaining her place on the world stage than being tied down by a militarily spineless organisation whose contribution to international military affairs has been to waste huge amounts of money in Mali and march up and down outside EU buildings....when it comes to dealing with Russian hostilities, the EU has been utterly useless.”

Mr Benn rejected Jeremy Corbyn’s attempt to swing Labour behind a policy of unilateral nuclear disarmament by opposing renewal of the Trident weapons system. The shadow Foreign Secretary told his audience: “If we gave ours up I don’t believe for a second any one of the other nuclear powers in the world would say: ‘Well, if you are not going to keep yours any more, we are going to chuck ours in the dustbin.’ It would not happen.”

Mr Benn added: “Who can predict what the threats will be in 20, 30, 40 years’ time?

The deterrent is intended to deter and I think it has succeeded in doing that. And finally, who fancies living in a world in which everyone else has given up their nuclear weapons and North Korea still has its nuclear weapons? If you fancy that put your hands up.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in