David Cameron reignites row over fox hunting as PM backs move to ease ban
Critics claim new plans from countryside campaigners will bring hunting in 'through the back door'
![Although hunting with dogs is banned in England and Wales, an exception is made for pest control purposes](https://static.independent.co.uk/s3fs-public/thumbnails/image/2013/10/14/17/rexfeatures_3119330f.jpg)
Your support helps us to tell the story
As your White House correspondent, I ask the tough questions and seek the answers that matter.
Your support enables me to be in the room, pressing for transparency and accountability. Without your contributions, we wouldn't have the resources to challenge those in power.
Your donation makes it possible for us to keep doing this important work, keeping you informed every step of the way to the November election
![Head shot of Andrew Feinberg](https://static.independent.co.uk/static-assets/support-us/andrew-feinberg.png)
Andrew Feinberg
White House Correspondent
David Cameron has put himself at odds with animal rights activists tonight after backing moves to ease the nine-year-old ban on fox hunting.
Although hunting with dogs is banned in England and Wales, an exception is made for pest control purposes. Farmers are currently allowed under the Hunting Act of 2004 to use two dogs to flush out foxes which threaten livestock.
But MPs and countryside campaigners are calling for the limit to be scrapped and for farmers to be permitted to use full packs of hounds, arguing it is quicker and more effective. They say fox attacks on lambs have increased in recent months and a change in the law is essential to protect farmers’ livelihoods. Downing Street said Mr Cameron was sympathetic to their argument, but critics retorted that the proposal was a way of reintroducing hunting by the back door.
The Prime Minister’s spokesman said: “There is a very specific issue here around pest control and the impact it has on particular farming communities, such as hill farmers. The Prime Minister has some sympathy with these concerns. They have been voiced by MPs across the House.”
The move would reopen a controversy which divided political opinion a decade ago ahead of the ban coming into force under Tony Blair’s government. Diluting the prohibition on the use of more than two dogs would appeal to many voters in rural areas, but could be unpopular with the electorate as a whole. The proposed change would require a vote in Parliament, but not a fresh Bill.
Joe Duckworth, the chief executive of the League Against Cruel Sports, said the new move was “nothing but an attempt at repeal by the back door, as the pro-hunt lobby know they can’t get a majority to repeal the Act overall”. He added: “Any attempts to move to weaken the Hunting Act will be resisted both by us and by the majority of the public who don’t want a return to hunting after a hard-fought campaign to get a ban.”
Maria Eagle, the shadow Environment Secretary, said: “Ministers are kidding themselves if they think there is a cross-party consensus on hunting. If the Tories insist on trying to change the law, they will find they simply don’t have the votes in Parliament.”
The majority of Conservative MPs, including the Environment Secretary Owen Paterson, support scrapping the Act altogether although opinion is divided among their Liberal Democrat Coalition partners.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments