Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Conservative plan to extend Right To Buy to housing associations would lead to more debt and fewer affordable homes, the IFS says

The respected economic research institute says the Coalition has a 'less-than-impressive' record on replacing homes

Jon Stone
Friday 24 April 2015 11:46 BST
Comments
An array of To Let and For Sale signs protrude from houses in the Selly Oak area of Birmingham on October 14, 2014 in Birmingham, United Kingdom
An array of To Let and For Sale signs protrude from houses in the Selly Oak area of Birmingham on October 14, 2014 in Birmingham, United Kingdom (Christopher Furlong/Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Conservatives’ plan to extend Right To Buy to housing associations would damage Britain’s public finances and deplete its social housing stock, the Institute for Fiscal Studies has said.

The respected economic research organisation, which is regularly cited as authoritative by the main political parties, said the “significant giveaway” would “worsen the UK’s underlying public finance position”.

The institute also said the Tories’ proposal to sell council properties to fund the move would force people on low incomes out of town centres and increasingly divide communities into rich and poor areas.

“Sales of expensive [local authority] properties would reduce the availability of social housing in the most expensive areas, thereby creating clearer divisions between areas where richer and poorer households are located,” a summary of a research note issued by the IFS said.

The institute said that the policy might potentially stimulate the building of social housing, albeit in less expensive areas that people on low incomes would be relegated to.

However, the IFS also notes that the Coalition has not made good on previous commitments to replace sold-off council housing and that social housing would probably become harder for people to get social housing because of the policy.

“There are considerable uncertainties surrounding the revenues that can be raised from sales of expensive properties, the costs of Right to Buy discounts and the cost of replacing sold properties. These reflect both genuine difficulties in predicting the effect of the policies and a lack of detail in the Conservative Party’s announcement,” the note said.

“Given this uncertainty, and the coalition’s less-than-impressive record in delivering replacement social housing under the existing Right to Buy, there is a risk that these policies will lead to a further depletion of the social housing stock – something the proposal explicitly seeks to avoid.”

The Right to Buy for council houses introduced by Margaret Thatcher’s government in 1980 and gave tenants the right to purchase their homes at substantial discounts.

Since 1980, almost 1.9 million council properties have been sold through Right to Buy in England and the total social housing stock has fallen by 26% since the first full year the policy came into effect.

The Tories proposed in their manifesto that half a million social housing tenants should be given access to the Right To Buy, to end what they describe as an “unfairness”.

“We are the party of working people, offering you security at every stage of your life,” David Cameron said at the policy’s launch.

Housing association bosses have threatened to take legal action if the policy were to come into effect.

You can read the IFS's briefing note in full HERE.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in