Clegg risks new rift with call for EU to bypass Cameron's veto
Your support helps us to tell the story
As your White House correspondent, I ask the tough questions and seek the answers that matter.
Your support enables me to be in the room, pressing for transparency and accountability. Without your contributions, we wouldn't have the resources to challenge those in power.
Your donation makes it possible for us to keep doing this important work, keeping you informed every step of the way to the November election
![Head shot of Andrew Feinberg](https://static.independent.co.uk/static-assets/support-us/andrew-feinberg.png)
Andrew Feinberg
White House Correspondent
Nick Clegg defied David Cameron by calling for the pact on fiscal union planned by other European Union countries to be "absorbed" into the EU's governing treaties.
The move would anger Conservative Eurosceptics, who claim it would undermine the veto wielded by David Cameron at last month's EU summit. His veto forced the other 26 nations to forge a separate "treaty outside the EU treaties".
Incorporating the agreement would mean Britain accepting the deal.
The Deputy Prime Minister hosted a meeting of 15 senior Liberal politicians from around Europe in London yesterday, which called for the fiscal union designed to save the euro "to be rolled into the EU treaties in due course".
Mr Clegg, who was furious that Mr Cameron did not try harder to avoid isolation at the Brussels summit, said Britain should get "stuck in" to EU negotiations and not "retreat to the margins." He added that the UK should be "engaged, not disengaged".
He told a press conference that Europe could only overcome its economic crisis by sticking together and avoiding "needless rivalry and isolation".
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments