Chilcot report: Farce deepens as Downing Street is forced to rule out inquiry into the inquiry
Instead, David Cameron's priority is to complete the inquiry itself
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The farce over the long-awaited publication of John Chilcot’s report into the Iraq War has deepened after Downing Street was forced to rule out having an inquiry into the inquiry.
David Cameron’s official spokeswoman was asked whether there was now a need to a separate investigation into delays in finalising the report – following a spate of criticism in recent days and weeks.
But she ruled out any such probe insisting that “the Prime Minister’s priority is to get the inquiry completed”.
It has also emerged that the Government will not wait for the publication of the Chilcot Report before deciding whether to extend British military action against Isis into Syria.
Mr Cameron’s spokeswoman insisted that he saw the two issues as “distinct” and would be prepared to go to the House of Commons to request British airstrikes against Isis without waiting for Sir John to report.
There is still no date set for the Chilcot Inquiry to report - despite growing pressure from across the political spectrum for the process of allowing those criticised in the report to comment on the findings to be speeded up.
The criticisms of slowness have been rejected by the inquiry panel. Sources close to Sir John are believed to feel the public criticism of them to be unfair and have hit back at what they see as political interference in the process that should be entirely independent.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments