Chilcot inquiry: Commons debate will try to fast-track publication of Iraq war report
The inquiry has now lasted more than 2000 days and cost almost £10m
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A Commons debate on the delayed Iraq War Inquiry will attempt to pressure Downing Street into fast-tracking its publication before the general election in May.
David Davis, the former shadow home secretary, led a group of cross-party MPs in winning time for the debate which will be held on January 29.
Sir John Chilcot’s report, which has investigated the run-up to the 2003 Iraq war and its aftermath, has now lasted over 2000 days and cost close to £10m.
Since it was set up by the former prime minister, Gordon Brown, the Chilcot Inquiry has taken evidence from over 120 witnesses and engaged in negotiating the full publication of previously classified documents with both the Cabinet Office and government offices in the United States, including the White House.
The Independent has previously reported that its finding will “challenge” the current explanations and background as to how and why Tony Blair led Britain into the US-led conflict with Saddam Hussein’s regime.
The serial delays in its publication were recently described by the former home secretary, Lord Hurd, as a “scandal”.
David Cameron said earlier this month that unless publication could be completed before the end of next month, it should be delayed till after the election. Mr David said further delay was “unacceptable” and would render the final report “pointless”.
Although the Backbench Business Committee agreed to the debate, any vote will not bind the government into publishing the inquiry’s findings.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments