Chilcot inquiry into Iraq War 'unlikely to be published this year'
Protracted correspondence with those criticised in the document was cited as a reason for the delay
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The British inquiry into the 2003 Iraq war and its aftermath, which completed its last hearing in February 2011 with the promise to report back in “some months”, is unlikely to be published this year.
BBC Newsnight said that protracted correspondence with those criticised in the document was one reason that its publication in 2015 looked “doubtful”.
The latest delay, if confirmed, will come as a severe blow to families of the 179 British servicemen killed in the nine-year war. It will also compound public scepticism. Earlier this year its chairman Sir John Chilcot said that the report would not be published before the election. Many saw the full parliamentary term of the new government in October and November as the next plausible deadline window.
The inquiry was set up in 2009 by the Prime Minister at the time, Gordon Brown, and took public evidence from its last witness in February 2011. The latest delay is understood to be due to the so-called "Maxwellisation" process, under which witnesses are sent draft sections criticising them to give them a final right of reply.
Letters were reportedly sent to those cited last December and are understood to run into hundreds of pages with a specific deadline. But the BBC suggests those have been challenged, moved or even abandoned altogether.
“Those I've spoken to in recent months say the Maxwellisation process has become a nightmare,” BBC Newsnight’s Diplomatic and Defence Editor Mark Urban wrote on Monday.
“Some of the dozens criticised have had to sift through Chilcot inquiry drafts that run to hundreds of pages. Others have engaged in a lively correspondence with the inquiry team, asking to draw on all sorts of additional correspondence in their defence.”
That reasoning chimes with testimony given to MPs by Sir John in February. When explaining the reason for its delay he said: “What I can't say, until the Maxwellisation process is complete, is that I will be able to say anything useful to the Prime Minister or to the families. Once that is complete it is a different matter."
In his blog, published on the BBC website on Monday, Mr Urban added: “While Sir John originally intended to give those due to be censured a deadline by which they would have to make representations in their defence, these have apparently been abandoned as the complexity of the process has become clear.
“The inquiry has also suffered from the death of one of its members and staff losses.”
Previous delays in publication have been down to protracted disagreements between Whitehall and the US State Department over declassifying communications between George W Bush and Tony Blair before, during and after the Iraq war. At the start of 2015 the Government admitted that talks over the publication of the gist of those conversations were now complete.
The report is understood to be over a million words long, analyses over 150,000 government documents and will contain details of discussions of more than 200 cabinet meetings.
David Cameron has previously said he has no control over when the Chilcot report will be published.
Sir John could not be reached last night for comment.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments