Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Cameron keeps his power dry on Leveson Report

No 10 says Prime Minister will read the report in full before making decisions on press regulation

Cahal Milmo
Sunday 25 November 2012 20:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Downing Street insist that David Cameron is "open-minded" about this week's Leveson Inquiry report on press regulation amid growing evidence of opposition in the Cabinet to statutory oversight of newspapers.

No 10 sought to quell claims the Prime Minister will resist calls by Lord Justice Leveson for a statutory press watchdog when he publishes his findings on Thursday and instead grant newspapers a period of grace to prove they can provide self-regulation.

As interested parties from privacy campaigners to newspaper groups jockey for position ahead of this week's report, The Mail on Sunday reported that Mr Cameron will bow to pressure to allow the press to set its own house in order but retain the threat of state-backed regulation if that fails.

Copies of the Leveson report will be delivered to Downing Street and other senior ministers on Wednesday to allow Mr Cameron to provide a formal response when it is published a day later. A No 10 spokesman said: "The Prime Minister is open-minded about Lord Justice Leveson's report and will read it in full before he makes any decision about what to do."

The culmination of the public inquiry which Mr Cameron ordered last year following revelations that the News of the World had hacked into the voicemails of murdered schoolgirl Milly Dowler is a problem for the Prime Minister. He must plot a path between supporters of legislation who argue the hacking scandal proved self-regulation cannot work and others, including most newspaper editors and proprietors as well as senior politicians, who believe any state intervention threatens the independence of the press.

William Hague, the Foreign Secretary, insisted he was reserving his judgement but hinted he is among Cabinet sceptics, also thought to include Education Secretary Michael Gove and Work and Pensions Secretary Iain Duncan Smith, instinctively opposed to statutory regulation.

Mr Hague told BBC1's Andrew Marr Show he wanted to read the report before commenting but added: "You have to err on the side of freedom."

Professor Brian Cathcart, director of Hacked Off, which is campaigning for a new legislation-backed newspaper watchdog and is backed by celebrities including Hugh Grant and Charlotte Church, said claims Mr Cameron had already made up his mind were "wishful thinking" by parts of the press.

The Leveson findings are expected to be the most far-reaching reckoning for the press in a generation with the industry holding its breath to see what regulatory structure, including a possible middle path based on existing statute but falling short of state-backed oversight, the High Court judge recommends.

Evgeny Lebedev, the chairman of The Independent and The Evening Standard, said he was strongly in favour of retaining self-regulation because of his experience of state control in his native Russia.

He told The Andrew Marr Show: "I feel instinctively against any form of government regulation...

"If we are to stay with some form of self-regulation it has to be extremely different from what it was before and make sure that whatever happened doesn't happen again."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in