Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Brown moves towards 6 May election

Pa
Wednesday 10 March 2010 12:57 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A 6 May general election is "practically inevitable" and a "no-brainer", political commentators said today as Gordon Brown confirmed 24 March as Budget day.

Holding the general election on 6 May would save money and the efforts of activists as it coincides with local elections in England, according to experts.

The move could also help Labour, whose success depends to a "massive extent" on getting its core vote out, one opinion pollster said.

"The people who are in the demographic groups who are most likely to vote Labour at the moment are more than twice as likely to say that they won't vote as people in the higher income brackets," said Andrew Hawkins, executive chairman of ComRes, the research and polling organisation.

"If you take the Labour seats where the incumbents have been caught out in the expenses scandal and they are trying to clear their name, they need all the votes that they can possibly get.

"The best way to do that is to coincide with the local elections."

He added: "It seems inconceivable that a decision on any day other than 6 May would be at all defensible, not least for the Labour activists who would otherwise be required to canvass for two elections, and, of course, the cost of running an election at a different time from the general election.

"I have confirmed my hotel reservation for 6 May in central London."

He added that the publication of first-quarter growth figures in the last fortnight of the campaign for a 6 May general election could prove crucial.

"In all the polling we are doing publicly and privately, the economy is the number one issue," he said.

Peter Kellner, president of the YouGov polling organisation, said he believed a 6 May general election date, the same day as the local elections, was now "practically inevitable" and a "no-brainer".

He added that he did not believe Chancellor Alistair Darling would set out "anything particularly new" in measures concerning taxation in his Budget.

"The political part of the Budget will be about public spending and making a case for saying that Labour's economic strategy will bring the deficit down in an orderly manner without creating damage to the public services," he said.

He added that if growth figures for the first quarter of the year - to be released in late April - showed a "double dip", this would be bad for Labour.

Figures showing "fragile" recovery would perhaps be the best outcome for Labour, he said, as voters might decide that changing the Government would imperil this, he said.

Political blogger Iain Dale, a Conservative candidate at the last election, said a 6 May date would be a gamble.

"People will have the full effects of tax rises which come into force in April. They will look at their wage packets at the end of April which will be a lot lighter than at the end of March," he said.

"Also the GDP figures will come out... who knows what the political consequences of that could be? It is a risky date, but, frankly, they cannot afford to have two separate elections because they are bankrupt."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in