EU will not accept 'pig in a poke' Brexit deal from Boris Johnson, Council president warns

Following high-level talks to revive stalled trade talks, prime minister says negotiations need 'a bit of oomph'

The European Union will not accept a “pig in a poke” deal from Boris Johnson, European Council president Charles Michel has said following high-level talks with the prime minister.

Mr Michel said that the EU’s demands for a level playing field on post-Brexit rules and regulations - which have been flatly rejected by the prime minister - were “essential” to an agreement on future trade and security relations.

In a joint statement following a high-level video conference talks design to inject new vigour into stalled trade talks, Boris Johnson and European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen said they were ready to "intensify" negotiations which have delivered no breakthrough since the UK’s formal departure from the EU on 31 January.

Mr Johnson insisted he believes the UK has a “very good” chance of securing a trade deal with the EU by the end of the year, “provided we really focus now and get on and do it”. He said that the talks needed "a bit of oomph" and urged the EU to be ready to reach agreement by the end of the summer.

But Mr Michel said the EU would "never accept a deal which goes against the interests of the Union".

Using the English expression for an item offered for sale without the buyer being able to inspect its quality he said: "A broad and ambitious agreement, in line with European Council guidelines, is in our mutual interest. Ready to put a tiger in the tank but not to buy a pig in a poke. Level playing field is essential."

The Scottish National Party warned that failure to make progress so far made it “increasingly likely the UK is heading towards a devastating bad-deal or no-deal Brexit”.

And a close ally of French president Emmanuel Macron made clear that Paris is prepared for a no-deal outcome if Mr Johnson refuses to make concessions on issues like fisheries and the level playing-field to avoid unfair competition.

The prime minister’s formal confirmation last week that the UK will not request an extension to talks with Brussels has heightened the pressure to achieve a swift agreement or face the prospect of new tariffs and other barriers to trade with the EU from 31 December.

Speaking as talks got under way, Mr Johnson’s official spokesman said that the PM would make clear that while the UK still wants to strike an "ambitious" free trade agreement (FTA) with the remaining EU, it is ready to move to World Trade Organisation rules from January 1 if a deal cannot be reached.

These would impose heavy tariffs on a number of imports, including a 10 per cent levy on motor vehicles coming from the EU, which is likely to push up the cost of standard family cars like Volkswagens and Renaults by £1,500 or more for British consumers.

Meanwhile, French former Europe minister Nathalie Loiseau, now a senior MEP for Mr Macron's En Marche party, told Radio 4's Today: “We are ready either for an agreement or for a no-deal. And we are getting prepared more actively to a no-deal considering the circumstances.

“We are waiting for Boris Johnson to get committed into the negotiations and to tell us if he really wants an agreement. So far there has been statements and positions repeated, but not something that looks like a real negotiation.”

Speaking in Downing Street following the talks, Mr Johnson said: “It’s very clear what the UK needs. We can’t have the involvement of the European Court of Justice in this country; we can’t have a system whereby we continue to have to obey EU law even when we’re out of the EU and we’ve got to get a great deal for our fish.

“It’s very clear what we need to achieve, I don’t think we’re actually that far apart, but what we need now is to see a bit of oomph in the negotiations.”

In a statement issued on Twitter shortly after today's talks, Ms von der Leyen said that she, Mr Michel and European Parliament president David Sassoli had "noted the UK’s decision not to extend the transition period and agreed to deliver the best deal for our citizens".

The EU had made clear that an extension of up to two years was available, and opinion polls suggested that the UK public wanted Mr Johnson to take advantage of the additional time because of the disruption to negotiations resulting from the coronavirus outbreak.

In a joint statement, Mr Johnson and Ms von der Leyen said that they "welcomed the constructive discussions" undertaken over the past four months by chief negotiators David Frost and Michel Barnier, which they said had allowed both sides to "clarify and further understand positions". They made clear the EU has accepted the UK's refusal to ask for an extension.

But they added: “The parties agreed nevertheless that new momentum was required. They supported the plans agreed by chief negotiators to intensify the talks in July and to create the most conducive conditions for concluding and ratifying a deal before the end of 2020.

"This should include, if possible, finding an early understanding on the principles underlying any agreement.”

SNP Westminster leader Ian Blackford said that Scottish Government analysis found that ending the transition period in 2020 could remove £3 billion from the Scottish economy in just two years - on top of the impact of coronavirus.

"Boris Johnson is taking the UK head-first towards a Brexit disaster - threatening our economy with the growing risk of a devastating bad deal or no-deal outcome," said Mr Blackford.

"Yet again, the Prime Minister is putting the narrow Tory Brexit obsession ahead of his responsibilities to protect people's jobs, businesses and living standards. He must think again, pause his failed talks and agree to the two-year transition period extension on offer.

"The UK already faces the worst economic crisis in decades. It would be reckless in the extreme for the Tory government to pile a Brexit crisis on top of coronavirus, which would put even more jobs and businesses at risk and cause unemployment to soar.