EU points out to May UK 'could have had any passport colour it wanted' without Brexit
Theresa May said the new passport is an expression of post-Brexit ‘independence and sovereignty’
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A senior European figure has dismissed Theresa May’s claims that the new blue passport is an expression of post-Brexit “independence and sovereignty”, as Britain could have chosen to switch colour while remaining in the EU.
The European Parliament’s chief Brexit coordinator Guy Verhofstadt said there was no EU law “dictating passport colour” so Britain could have brought back the traditional blue travel document at any time.
The Government announced on Friday that burgundy British passports would be replaced with blue and gold documents from 2019 as the contract is up for its regular five-year renewal.
Ms May tweeted: “The UK passport is an expression of our independence and sovereignty – symbolising our citizenship of a proud, great nation.
“That’s why we have announced that the iconic blue passport will return after we leave the European Union in 2019.”
Eurosceptic MPs seized on the news as a symbol of Britain casting off Europe’s influence but Mr Verhofstadt pointed out that Britain could have chosen to switch the colour regardless of Brexit.
There is no Brussels regulation which states that EU countries’ passports have to be a certain colour, only a legally non-binding European Council resolution from 1981 that recommends burgundy.
Mr Verhofstadt tweeted: “There is no EU legislation dictating passport colour. The UK could have had any passport colour it wanted and stay in the EU.”
It comes amid reports that the new passports could spell travel delays and extra paperwork for British citizens unless the Government makes concessions in the Brexit talks.
EU officials told The Guardian that “depending on how negotiations go on all free movement issues after Brexit”, British passport holders could lose the right to use fast-track citizens lanes abroad and might have to use a new visa waiver scheme similar to the American Esta scheme.
Brexiteer MPs are now demanding that the new passports are made in the UK as EU tendering rules mean the documents could be produced abroad.
Prominent Tory backbencher Jacob Rees-Mogg tweeted: “Symbolism is important and I hope it will be printed in the UK too.”
And Conservative MP Andrew Bridgen said: “Passports are symbolic of our national identity and sovereignty and of course they should be manufactured in the UK.”
The new passports will be phased in after the UK leaves the European Union in March 2019, with the EU insignia removed.
The blue colour was actually a foreign imposition, originating in guidance issued by the League of Nations in 1920, and the UK has introduced some biometric features to comply with American visa waiver requirements.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments