Sign up to our free Brexit and beyond email for the latest headlines on what Brexit is meaning for the UK
Sign up to our Brexit email for the latest insight
Senior Tories have attacked Boris Johnson’s plan to axe the department delivering Britain’s foreign aid, warning efforts to help the poor – and the UK’s security – will suffer.
Alistair Burt, a former Dfid minister who stood down at the election, said: “My advice would be not to merge DfID and the FCO. DfID as a standalone department has given the UK an outstanding reputation. It runs very well.
And Andrew Mitchell, a former international development secretary, urged Mr Johnson to think again, saying: “DfID is the most effective and respected engine of development anywhere in the world, and a huge soft power asset for Britain.
“Tackling insecurity and building prosperity directly affects our wellbeing in the UK. British leadership in this area is a core part of Global Britain.”
Save the Children has also criticised a “deeply damaging move that risks endangering the impact big-hearted Britons can have around the world”.
“DfID multiplies the impact of British kindness, whether by ensuring we get value for money from every pound spent or guaranteeing our brave aid workers support from a government department that cares only for their safety and success,” said Kevin Watkins, its chief executive.
Government sources have confirmed to The Independent that a major shake-up of Whitehall departments will go ahead in the New Year, once the UK has formally left the EU on 31 January.
General election 2019: How the night unfolded
Show all 27
It is expected to create a powerful new business department – absorbing the international trade department – in a bid to secure greater inward investment to the regions, despite Brexit.
Backing scrapping the aid department earlier this year, Mr Johnson said: “If ‘Global Britain’ is going to achieve its full and massive potential then we must bring Dfid to the FCO.”
He also accused the department of “inevitable waste as money is shoved out of the door in order to meet the 0.7 per cent target” – raising fears its budget will be slashed.
He also told the Financial Times: “We can’t keep spending huge sums of British taxpayers’ money as though we were some independent Scandinavian NGO [non-governmental organisation].
And he added: “It is perfectly possible to boost global development in a way that coheres much better with UK political and indeed commercial objectives.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies