Ancient rules could be enacted to fine hackers
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Journalists who hacked the telephones of MPs could face fines for being in contempt of Parliament under proposals by a House of Commons inquiry which reported yesterday. The Standards and Privileges Committee ruled that hacking could be regarded as an infringement of the traditional rights of MPs. Its investigation was prompted by allegations that the News of the World hacked the phones of several MPs.
The committee said it would be better for allegations of hacking to be resolved by the courts but, if that did not happen, MPs could take action under ancient parliamentary rules. The power to impose a financial penalty on the public has not been invoked since 1666, when Thomas White was fined £1,000 (about £114,000 in today's money).
White absconded after being ordered into the custody of the Serjeant at Arms, for causing Henry Chowne, the MP for Horsham, to be arrested and prevented from attending Parliament. Some experts regard the power to fine as having lapsed. But the committee said it should be formally revived when a new Privileges Bill is brought forward later this year.
Another option, it said, would be for reporters or editors to be summoned to the Bar of the House inside the Commons chamber for a formal reprimand. This was last used in 1957, when Sir John Junor, editor-in-chief of the Sunday Express, apologised for suggesting MPs were evading petrol rationing after the Suez crisis.
But the committee conceded this might be viewed as "high-handed" and said: "The imposition of a fine is more consistent with modern practice."
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.