London's first 'poverty map' in 1899 shows a very different city to today
Maps dating back to 1575 exhibited by London map specialist Daniel Crouch Rare Books as part of Totally Thames festival
Your support helps us to tell the story
As your White House correspondent, I ask the tough questions and seek the answers that matter.
Your support enables me to be in the room, pressing for transparency and accountability. Without your contributions, we wouldn't have the resources to challenge those in power.
Your donation makes it possible for us to keep doing this important work, keeping you informed every step of the way to the November election
Andrew Feinberg
White House Correspondent
A handful of fascinating old maps of London have been released showing the divisions of rich and poor, the first attempts at a large-scale survey of the city and the last attempt to depict every single building in the capital.
The map above (large version here) was drawn by Charles Booth in 1899 and depicts areas of "chronic want" in black and wealth in "gold".
In some ways it does resemble the London of 2014, with Chelsea and Notting Hill still being the most affluent areas as they were at the turn of the 20th century, but in others it is starkly different, particularly in terms of how much central London and the east end have changed.
And given rocketing house prices and rent rates in the capital of late, you could argue that were a similar map drawn today the vast majority of it would be in gold.
The maps comes from the Mapping London exhibition which is part of the Totally Thames festival, with other earlier ones showing more pictorial images of London, including the earliest extant map created by Georg Braun and Franz Hogenberg in 1575.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments