Supermarkets accused of 'sexist pricing' after charging women more than men for same products
Morrisons is charging women 50 per cent more for toiletries than men
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Supermarkets are charging women considerably more for the same toiletries than men, research has found.
A detailed analysis of hundreds of own-brand supermarket products such as shaving gel, deodorant and razors has found that products marketed as ‘women’s toiletries’ are considerably more expensive than ‘male versions’, which have the same ingredients, function and quality.
The study, undertaken by The Fawcett Society charity, which promotes gender equality, found Morrisons supermarket charges female shoppers 56 per cent more than men for their bath products.
The difference was found to be 25 per cent at Sainsbury’s, 24 per cent at Tesco and 22 per cent at Asda.
No such difference was found to exist at Waitrose, as the company has own brand toiletries that are not branded by gender.
Sam Smethers, chief executive of the Fawcett Society said: “The top four supermarkets between them have a 70 per cent market share. The majority of those customers will be women.
“Here we see them consistently charging significantly more for their own-brand products which are marketed at women. In most cases these are not minor price differences. These are big margins.
“We know that women are paid less than men, are targeted with beauty products and advertising and now we see them being charged more. It will make many women ask themselves if they can trust these high street brands.
“The big four have an opportunity here. Will they go the extra mile to demonstrate to their female customers that their pricing is fair? We don’t just want to see one or two prices reduced, we want sexist pricing to end.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments