Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Supermarkets using 'shocking tactics' to extract money from suppliers

Industry giants have allegedly demanded a supplier pay £25,000 to attend a charity ball and doled out fines for bruised apples

Charlotte England
Sunday 12 March 2017 18:51 GMT
Comments
A supermarket worker stocks shelves
A supermarket worker stocks shelves (Rex)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Supermarkets like Tesco and Morrisons are using “shocking tactics” to extort money from their suppliers, a Government watchdog has claimed.

In one case, a supplier was pressured to spend £25,000 on a table at a charity ball or risk having their product withdrawn from shelves, according to groceries code adjudicator Christine Tacon.

Speaking on the “power of supermarkets” at a Westminster Forum conference, Ms Tacon reportedly said she regularly hears about stores claiming delivered goods never arrived, asking suppliers to pay to keep their goods on the shelves, and charging the supplier up to £55 if a customer complains about their product.

She said supermarkets even charge suppliers for absurd and obviously “foolish” complaints.

“I had a supplier who was charged £45 after someone complained about finding a teabag ‘inside’ an egg, which was ridiculous,” she said, according to a report in The Times.

“I had a supplier expected to pay £25,000 for a table at a charity ball,” she told the conference. “They come under pressure like being told: ‘Well, if you don’t buy a table, your name will be on a list of people to the chief executive that are not supporting our charity.’ They are also told they can meet buyers if they buy tickets for golf or fishing days.”

Ms Tacon's comments are in keeping with past reports – Britain's 10 largest supermarkets have been accused of exploiting their suppliers for the last two decades.

In 2009 the Government drew up the groceries supply code of practice and in 2013 it created the post of groceries code adjudicator, to oversee dealings between supermarkets and suppliers.

However research suggests the situation may be getting worse, despite efforts to control industry giants. Supermarkets' use of “predatory practices” helped drive more than 150 food producers out of business last year, according to research by accountancy firm Moore Stephens, The Times reports – nearly triple the 56 lost in 2011.

Ms Tacon said she was also launching an investigation into the millions of pounds being stripped from suppliers under “drop and drive”.

This is where perishable food is sent to distributors but some of it does not appear on the payment system, with supermarkets claiming the products were never received.

Ms Tacon said a preliminary investigation of 20 supply firms found they lost £15m a year to drop and drive – implying far greater amounts lost across the sector’s 8,000-9,000 firms.

She said: “The supermarkets are genuinely not paying for goods that they are selling. If 20 suppliers are losing £15m then what’s the cost to the industry?”

Another practice which she claims her office is stamping out, involves supermarkets charging suppliers up to £55 if customers complain about anything, from bruised fruit to not liking a ready meal.

Last year, the Groceries Code Adjudicator (GCA) forced Morrisons to apologise after an email, seen by the Guardian, revealed it had asked suppliers to fund recent investments it had made.

The supermarket had allegedly called dozens of food firms to a meeting where it demanded lump sums averaging £2m from each to keep stocking their products.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in