Single parents who flee abroad with child 'cannot escape UK court proceedings'
Supreme Court rules in such instances parents cannot claim they now live outside UK's jurisdiction
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Single parents who take their children and flee abroad cannot escape court proceedings by claiming they now live outside the UK’s jurisdiction, the Supreme Court has ruled.
The UK’s most senior judges upheld a lesbian woman’s argument that she had rights as a de facto parent after the child’s biological mother left Britain and took the child to Pakistan following a relationship breakdown. The ruling followed the refusal of High Court and Appeal Court judges to order the seven-year-old girl’s return to the UK. The lower courts said they did not have the jurisdiction to make such an order as the child was already living in Pakistan.
Lawyer Simon Bruce, of Farrer & Co, representing the Reunite International Child Abduction Centre in the case, said: “This judgment is of huge practical significance – and is a remarkably humane and modern judgment. The court has sent out a message that a parent with sole legal rights will no longer succeed in avoiding proceedings by abducting a child.”
The courts heard the couple, who lived in a same-sex relationship, had a child after IVF treatment. The father was an unknown sperm donor of Asian background. The couple never entered into a civil partnership and the biological mother was the sole legal parent. In 2011, the relationship broke down and the partner moved out of the family home but had regular contact with the girl and continued to help pay the household bills.
That contact ended suddenly in 2014 and the partner discovered that mother and child, both British nationals, had moved to Pakistan where the mother had family ties.
However, Lord Wilson, giving the majority decision, said judges in the lower courts were wrong to think the child’s habitual residence ended the day she left England and flew to Pakistan.
The case will now return to the High Court where a judge will decide what happens next. Lord Wilson said the judge hearing the case may wish to consider making the child a party to the case by appointing a guardian.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments