Secretary Chris Grayling told he gave 'misleading' guidance on rights to legal aid at inquests
Inquest is the latest legal challenge to controversial provisions of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012
Support truly
independent journalism
Our mission is to deliver unbiased, fact-based reporting that holds power to account and exposes the truth.
Whether $5 or $50, every contribution counts.
Support us to deliver journalism without an agenda.
Louise Thomas
Editor
Lord Chancellor and Justice Secretary Chris Grayling was told by a judge today he issued “materially misleading and inaccurate” guidance on rights to legal aid at inquests.
It is the latest legal challenge to controversial provisions of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (Laspo). The judgment was a victory for Joanna Letts, 39, from Lambeth, south London, who was initially denied public funding by the Legal Aid Agency (LAA) for representation at the inquest into the death of her mentally ill brother Christopher Letts.
Mr Letts, 29, killed himself in August 2013 three days after leaving a private clinic. Ms Letts challenged the legality of hurdles that have to overcome to be represented at inquests which engage issues under Article 2 (protection of life) of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments