Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

UK's 'withered' armed forces could not protect against attack by Russia, warns former army chief

'Neither the UK homeland nor a deployed force could be protected from a concerted Russian air effort,' says retired general

Jacob Furedi
Saturday 17 September 2016 13:13 BST
Comments
Russian tanks in Moscow's Red Square
Russian tanks in Moscow's Red Square (Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The United Kingdom’s armed forces have “withered” and would not be able to defend the country against an invasion by Russia or another major military power, the former head of the Joint Forces Command has warned Defence Secretary Michael Fallon.

General Sir Richard Barrons described how Whitehall’s preoccupation with “skinning” budgets has created “profoundly difficult” logistical challenges.

He claimed in a memo sent to the Defence Secretary Sir Richard said the UK no longer has the capability to fight conventional wars because it has been too reliant on its allies, such as the United States, in the past.

The warning comes despite the Government's decision to increase defence spending by nearly £5 billion by 2020/21 and to meet Nato's target to spend 2 per cent of GDP on defence for the rest of the decade.

In the memo - sent before retired in April as head of Joint Forces Command and obtained by the Financial Times - Sir Richard concludes: “Neither the UK homeland nor a deployed force could be protected from a concerted Russian air effort.”

“There is a sense that modern conflict is ordained to be only as small and as short terms as we want to afford – and that is absurd,” he remarked.

His comments will concern Britain’s Nato allies, with a US army general suggesting back in June that Russia has the military power to overwhelm eastern Europe

Afghanistan army battles to push Taliban from Tarinkot

Among the weaknesses within the UK’s armed forces, Sir Richard highlighted how RAF planes and Navy ships are frequently deployed with insufficient ammunition because they are overly dependent on US support.

Sir Richard, who retired as a four-star general, noted: “Capability that is foundational to all major armed forces has been withered by design.”

“Counter-terrorism is the limit of up-to-date plans and preparations to secure our airspace, waters and territory… There is no top-to-bottom command and control mechanism, preparation or training in place [to defend UK territory]… let alone do so with Nato,” he wrote.

Sir Richard suggested the lamentable state of Britain’s armed forces is a result of poor budgeting: “We operate platforms that we cannot afford to use fully.”

He highlighted the Navy’s use of new aircraft carriers that “we cannot afford to use fully, damage or lose.”

Britain’s Air Force is also an area of particular concern: “It is not necessary to shoot down all the UK’s Joint Strike Fighters, only to know how to murder in their best the 40 or so people who can fly them,” Sir Richard wrote.

Major General Tim Cross, who served in the Army for nearly 40 years, rejected suggestions Sir Richard's comments were a case of “sour grapes” because he was overlooked for promotion.

Maj Gen Cross said such assumptions were “unfair and wrong”, and that Sir Richard was an “extremely capable operator”.

“Like all commanders, and I did this myself when I handed over command of my division, what Richard has done is produce what we call a haul down report,” he told BBC Radio 4's Today programme.

“A haul down report is a state of the nation, it's a final shot to say to the system - in this case the Secretary of State because Richard was a four-star general - 'this is my command, this is what it looks like, these are my concerns', and he's laid those out.

“He's speaking truth into power and it's a normal thing to be doing.”

Despite Sir Richard's comments, a Ministry of Defence spokesman said its most recent defence review “was backed by all of the service chiefs.”

Although the latest Strategic Defence and Security Review increased the armed forces’ budget, many believe it is still insufficient.

The UK’s Air Force is due to introduce 48 F35 Joint Strike Fighters, the most expensive and advanced combat aircraft in operation. The small number of planes, however, means only six aircraft will be operated at a time.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in