Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Reactor closure puts medical scans at risk as shortage of radioactive material could jeopardise patients’ health

Doctors are searching for an alternative to key element used in diagnosis

Kashmira Gander
Sunday 24 November 2013 01:00 GMT
Comments
The technetium-99m isotope is used in gamma cameras operated by nuclear medicine technologists
The technetium-99m isotope is used in gamma cameras operated by nuclear medicine technologists (PA)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A worldwide shortage of radioactive material vital for the operation of medical scanners could jeopardise patients’ health in the UK, say senior doctors. They are calling on the Government to prevent a shortage of a radioactive isotope used to diagnose cancers and heart defects.

Britain’s supply of  molybdenum-99m  is sourced from six nuclear facilities – in France, the Netherlands, Belgium South Africa, Australia and Canada. However, the situation reached a critical level when it was announced that the reactor which supplies 40 per cent of the world’s molybdenum will close in 2016.

Decades of service have made many nuclear reactors unreliable, and by 2016 when Canada’s Chalk River reactor halts its manufacture of molybdenum-99m, patients may be exposed to delays unless alternatives sources are found. Current vulnerabilities were highlighted this month after a leak at the South African Nuclear Energy Corporation plant and the unexpected temporary closure of the Mallinckrodt plant in Holland caused global shortages that are expected to be felt in hospitals in the coming weeks.

In 2007, a shortfall in the US saw around 50,000 appointments cancelled over a five-week period when the temporary closure of the Chalk River facility coincided with the shutdown of Dutch, Belgian, and French reactors.

Alan Perkins, professor of medical physics at Nottingham University, said that the UK’s reliance on imports from ageing nuclear reactors has “caused a huge amount of problems” and “caught a lot of [clinicians] out”. The shutdowns this month and the impending closure of Chalk River had made finding a solution to the problem critical.

Molybdenum is used to make the isotope technetium-99m which is currently used in 30 million diagnostic procedures across the globe each year, making it the most commonly used medical isotope.

“We’ve been aware of the problems for five years,” said Professor Brian Neilly, president of the British Nuclear Medicine Society. “There have been times in the past where we’ve had to reschedule patients. In times of shortage the community in the UK have shared the resource to lessen the impact,” he added.

Professor Erika Denton, national clinical director for diagnostics at NHS England, said she hoped British hospitals would find new techniques to reduce dependence on overseas supplies. She said the Department of Health and the British Nuclear Medicine Society were working on a report to be published early next year which explored “alternative imaging solutions” to those provided by reactor-produced isotopes. “We work with the main suppliers of medicinal isotopes to the UK and with healthcare providers to ensure any impact is minimal. Alternative tests or treatments are available in the majority of cases.”

Professor Neilly said: “We are producing a road map for the future and we have to see if government will follow or not. There’s a difference between flagging something up and whether or not a government will back or fund it.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in