Protesters to carry on camping
![](https://static.independent.co.uk/s3fs-public/thumbnails/image/2009/02/05/21/127651.jpg)
Support truly
independent journalism
Our mission is to deliver unbiased, fact-based reporting that holds power to account and exposes the truth.
Whether $5 or $50, every contribution counts.
Support us to deliver journalism without an agenda.
![Louise Thomas](https://static.independent.co.uk/static-assets/support-us/louise-thomas.png)
Louise Thomas
Editor
Women peace activists have been told by a judge they can continue camping outside the Aldermaston nuclear weapons site, no matter how "tiresome" the Ministry of Defence thinks they are.
The delighted demonstrators hailed yesterday's High Court judgment as a victory for the right to protest. It overturns what they described as an "absurd" bylaw banning protests outside the site.
The £900m-a-year Atomic Weapons Establishment at Aldermaston near Newbury, which makes warheads for Trident missiles, has been targeted since the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament was founded half a century ago. Since the 1980s, the Aldermaston Women's Peace Camp (AWPC) has become a familiar feature of the local landscape.
The camp came under threat when a bylaw was introduced in 2007, banning "camping in tents, caravans, trees, or otherwise" anywhere within the "controlled area" around the perimeter fence.
The women's first appeal was thrown out, but at the Old Bailey yesterday three Appeal Court judges overturned the bylaw. The Ministry of Defence had argued it was required for national security, but the judges ruled that civil servants and ministers had failed to come up with adequate justification to deny the women their civil rights.
"Rights worth having are unruly things," said Lord Justice Laws, presiding. "Demonstrations and protests are liable to be a nuisance. They are liable to be inconvenient and tiresome, or at least perceived as such by others who are out of sympathy with them.
"Sometimes they are wrong-headed and misconceived. Sometimes they betray a kind of arrogance, an arrogance which assumes that spreading the word is always more important than the mess which, often literally, the exercise leaves behind. In that case, firm but balanced regulation may well be justified."
But he said: "In this case, there is no substantial factor of that kind. As for the rest, whether the AWPC's cause is wrong-headed or misconceived is neither here nor there, and if their activities are inconvenient or tiresome, the Secretary of State for Defence's shoulders are surely broad enough to cope."
The camp, established in 1985 as a spin off from the celebrated peace camp on Greenham Common, comes together on the second weekend of every month and lasts from Friday evening to Sunday lunchtime. All women are welcome, although men must leave when dark falls.
The appeal against the ban was lodged in the name of Kay Tabernacle, a veteran peace activist from Cardiff, whose barrister, David Pievsky, argued that it violated her rights under the European Convention on Human Rights.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments