Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Palace accused of 'contempt' over heating bills

Tony Jones,Rosamond Hutt,Pa
Friday 24 September 2010 14:53 BST
Comments
(EPA)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Buckingham Palace was accused of having "contempt" for ordinary people today after it emerged officials tried to apply for grants, aimed at helping low-income families, to heat royal palaces.

Aides made inquiries about funding to replace four boilers after royal gas and electricity bills increased by 50% in 2004 to more than £1 million, a level described as "untenable".

But Government officials said the Royal Household was not eligible for the cash and if money was handed over they feared it would lead to "probable adverse press coverage".

Republic, the anti-monarchy campaign group, called for the management of the palaces to be opened up to full scrutiny after the attempts to get funding were revealed in documents disclosed to the Independent newspaper under a Freedom of Information request.

A Republic spokesman said: "These documents are clear evidence of the contempt the Palace has for ordinary people in this country.

"We have our head of state demanding cash that has been set aside for low-income families, for the most vulnerable in our society.

"The Palace has repeatedly refused to change the way it is managed, it has refused to open its doors to the public all year round, to raise the revenue it needs, instead they continue to go cap in hand to our Government for more handouts.

"This sense of entitlement speaks volumes about the attitudes of the Windsors and their household. For them it's all about take, take, take."

The documents revealed the Queen's deputy treasurer wrote to the Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) in 2004 to ask if they would be eligible for a handout from the £60m Community Energy Programme.

He asked: "Community Energy can fund up to 40% of the capital costs of implementing a community heating scheme... Since we are already grant-in-aid funded we would like to know whether the Household (would) be able to benefit from these grants. I look forward to your comments."

At the time the Royal Household's property services department received a grant-in-aid of around £15 million to pay for the up-keep of occupied royal palaces.

It was hoped the money could be used to replace the combined heat and power units at Buckingham Palace and Windsor Castle.

But in an apologetic email sent to the Palace, it was explained that the handouts were aimed at schools, hospitals, councils and housing associations for heating programmes which benefit low-income families.

The official said: "I think this is where the community energy funding is directed and ties in with most allocations going to community heating schemes run by local authorities, housing associations, universities etc.

"I also feel a bit uneasy about the probable adverse press coverage if the Palace were given a grant at the expense of say a hospital. Sorry this doesn't sound more positive."

A DCMS spokesman explained the reasons behind the request for funding by Buckingham Palace.

He said: "It was initially thought that the royal palaces as publicly maintained buildings might be eligible, but subsequent advice from the Treasury pointed out that the scheme was aimed at schemes serving public sector customers such as local authorities, social housing providers, hospitals, universities, and other public sector buildings such as schools, leisure centres and town halls."

A Buckingham Palace spokeswoman declined to comment on the disclosures.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in