Michael Gove attacks top universities for not being honest about preferred A-levels
Criticism follows evidence that state school and ethnic minority pupils struggle to get onto the best courses
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Top universities were accused by Education Secretary Michael Gove today of failing to be honest with pupils over what they should study at A-level to stand the best chance of securing a place.
He was responding to new research from Durham University which showed state school pupils and those from ethnic minority groups were finding it more difficult to get into universities in the Russell Group – which represents 24 of the country’s top higher education research institutions including Oxford and Cambridge.
On average, state school pupils who won places had one grade higher at A-level than those from private schools. A similar picture emerged when comparing ethnic minority with white candidates.
“Too many people in higher education are not honest about subject and qualification choices which prepare students best for university,” he said.
“Privately academics will complain about the failure of prospective students to take demanding courses – in maths, natural science, languages and the humanities but publicly they do not properly advertise that some courses and qualifications are better preparation for higher study.”
Mr Gove said the lack of clarity benefited independent schools which often had the contacts to find the information out for themselves.
“Universities should provide clear and unambiguous guidance without favour on the best preparations for their courses and then allow merit to dictate entry,” he added.
Dr Wendy Piatt, director general of the Russell Group, rejected Mr Gove’s criticisms, saying: “Our universities are very clear about preferred studies- both in general and for particular courses.”
Oxford published a detailed list of entry requirements, the London School of Economics published lists of subject combinations and non-preferred subjects, Sheffield published details of acceptable A-levels and University College London published a list of preferred subjects.
“However, we know that in some schools students are not getting the right advice and guidance on which subjects to study,” she added.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments