Human rights groups boycott rendition and torture inquiry
Your support helps us to tell the story
As your White House correspondent, I ask the tough questions and seek the answers that matter.
Your support enables me to be in the room, pressing for transparency and accountability. Without your contributions, we wouldn't have the resources to challenge those in power.
Your donation makes it possible for us to keep doing this important work, keeping you informed every step of the way to the November election
![Head shot of Andrew Feinberg](https://static.independent.co.uk/static-assets/support-us/andrew-feinberg.png)
Andrew Feinberg
White House Correspondent
Te inquiry into whether British security services were complicit in the rendition and torture of terrorism suspects was thrown into chaos yesterday when a key group of human rights lawyers and campaign organisations pulled out.
The boycott was sparked by the publication of the inquiry's protocols which ruled that the Government would have the final say over whether the material uncovered during proceedings could be made public.
Lawyers representing former detainees of Guantanamo and secret prisons abroad said their clients would also be unable to cross-examine evidence or witnesses, describing the torture inquiry as "secretive and toothless". In a joint letter to the inquiry, the 10 groups – including Liberty, Amnesty and Reprieve – said they felt compelled to boycott proceedings because of the lack of "credibility or transparency".
A spokeswoman for the inquiry insisted that it would still go ahead. She said the inquiry "would welcome" evidence to back up claims of the involvement by UK agencies and said of the boycott: "We hope they will reconsider their decision."
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments