Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Prince William's wedding to Kate Middleton in April will be a carefully choreographed occasion, steeped in tradition, and watched proudly by an expectant nation. But his engagement party will, by all accounts, be quite the opposite.
The gangster rapper Snoop Dogg appeared to endorse extravagant tabloid rumours that he'd been asked to perform at the forthcoming event yesterday, using his website and Twitter feed to inform fans that he'd dedicated his latest single, "Wet", to the future groom.
In comments that were neither confirmed nor denied by St James's Palace, the performer, whose real name is Calvin Broadus, said he was happy to compromise his streetwise profile by crossing the Atlantic to entertain guests at the bash, which is expected to be organised by the mooted best man, Prince Harry.
"When I heard that the Royal Family wanted to have me perform in celebration of Prince William's marriage, I knew I had to give them a little something," read a statement on the "Doggfather's" website. "'Wet' is the perfect anthem for Prince William or any playa to get the club smokin'."
It wasn't entirely clear, however, whether the veteran rapper, 39, was responding to a formal royal invitation, or merely reacting to reports in the Daily Mirror last month, which claimed he had been approached by Prince Harry to perform along with British hip-hop artist, Tinie Tempah.
A spokesperson for the Princes said: "As Snoop Dogg has stated on his Twitter page, he has written a song for Prince William's engagement party. With regard to that, and that party, and the details of that party, it's too early for us to know more at this stage."
Unlike the royal wedding, which will be a public holiday, any engagement or stag party will be "an entirely private occasion", the aide added.
If Snoop Dogg does perform, a veil of privacy may be just as well. His lyrics are colourful enough to ensure that most of the albums in his back catalogue come with "parental advisory" notices. The single "Wet" is no exception – a sequel to the rapper's 2008 hit "Sexual eruption", it contains several passages that verge on the pornographic.
Though the Princes are known to be fans of hip-hop, and have somewhat more exotic recreational tastes than their father, who spent his stag night with a group of aristocratic chums in a private suite at the gentlemen's club, White's, even they may blanch at associating themselves with a man who boasts Snoop Dogg's criminal profile.
The rapper was brought up on the mean streets of Long Beach, an unlovely suburb of Los Angeles, and as a teenager was associated with the Crips street gang. He served six months in prison for cocaine trafficking after leaving school. He was charged, but then acquitted, of a gangland murder in 1993, convicted of illegal firearm possession in 1997, and has several convictions for marijuana possession.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments