Goldsmith's advice on treatment of Iraqi prisoners is censored
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Government has blocked the release of the former attorney general Lord Goldsmith's advice about whether human rights law applied to British troops in Iraq when handling prisoners.
Lawyers for Iraqi detainees allegedly abused by UK soldiers claim Lord Goldsmith's legal opinion would cast light on allegations being considered by a public inquiry into the death of the Basra hotel receptionist Baha Mousa. But the inquiry's chairman, Sir William Gage, has accepted the Ministry of Defence's argument that it must remain secret.
Lord Goldsmith's advice on whether the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) applied to UK operations in Iraq is contained in seven documents dated between 16 February and 16 April 2003.
The MoD argued in submissions to the inquiry that the papers were covered by legal professional privilege, which protects communications between lawyers and their clients. But lawyers for Mr Mousa's family said the advice was important because the ECHR made it clear that prisoner-handling techniques employed by British troops in Iraq should not have been used.
Lord Goldsmith summarised his position when he gave evidence to the Chilcot Inquiry into the Iraq war in January this year. He said: "Fundamentally, my advice was that the obligations about the proper treatment of people, which are contained in the European Convention, did apply in relation to detainees." The inquiry is currently looking at who in the chain of command told British soldiers serving in Iraq in 2003 they could use these banned methods. Lord Goldsmith, the Government's chief legal adviser at the time, insisted the authorisation did not come from him.
Sir William read the seven documents drawn up by the former attorney general before giving his ruling. He said: "In my opinion the documents which form the advice remain confidential and I cannot direct that any of them be produced by the MoD."
The inquiry is investigating allegations that British soldiers beat Mr Mousa to death in Basra, southern Iraq, in 2003.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments