Experts call for full inquest into death of David Kelly
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A group of medical experts has demanded a full inquest into the death David Kelly, the government weapons inspector, in 2003 after dismissing the conclusion of the inquiry by Lord Hutton as "unsatisfactory".
In a letter to The Times, the experts including a former coroner, Michael Powers, a professor of intensive care medicine, Julian Bion, and three forensic physicians, said it was "extremely unlikely" that Dr Kelly died of a haemorrhage from his cut wrist, the official cause of death given by the inquiry.
Allegations and counter-allegations about the safety of this verdict have swirled for years. Doctors have pointed out that the wound to Dr Kelly's wrist, thought to have been self-inflicted, would not have led to sufficient blood loss to kill him. Although Dr Kelly also swallowed a quantity of co-proxamol tablets, a powerful pain-killer, the injury to his wrist is given as the principal cause of death.
The authors of the letter said they had written it in response to the "continuing interest" in Dr Kelly's death.
Dr Powers said: "The medical evidence [on which the opinion was based] is solely that which is on the Hutton website. Obviously there has been other evidence. We have not commented on that because we weren't there. The way to look at it is to ask: 'What did he die of?' It is impossible to start to explore what happened to him until we have ascertained what he died of."
Dr Powers said the group was making no judgment about what happened to Dr Kelly. "We don't have the expertise to make that decision." he said. The Attorney General, Dominic Grieve, has indicated that he is concerned about the case.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments