Driving ban upheld for speeding 90-year-old
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A 90-year-old war veteran caught speeding in a car for the disabled must serve a six-month ban, the High Court has ruled.
Ex-Grenadier Guardsman Roland Morris, from Worle, Weston-super-Mare, Somerset, was caught in a radar speed trap doing 42mph in a 30mph zone last year.
Disabled Mr Morris, who was injured on active service in Africa in 1943 during the Second World War, was in his motability car on the A38 between Highbridge and Bridgwater.
He already had nine points on his licence and was banned under the "totting up" procedure when he appeared before Taunton Dene magistrates in January.
The ban was upheld by the Crown Court, although a fine of £300 was reduced to £200.
Mr Morris came to the High Court in London on Thursday in a last attempt to overturn the ban by applying for judicial review.
Wearing a Guards Division tie, he drove to the doors of Court 28 in a red four-wheeled disabled buggy, which he later took into the Royal Courts of Justice cafe.
He told two judges that he had no idea he was speeding and would never drive again if he did not think it was safe to do so.
He argued that he had been "induced" into pleading guilty and denied a fair hearing.
He said he wanted to carry on driving for the sake of his mental health and his community work.
Lord Justice Pitchford, sitting with Mr Justice Maddison, described Mr Morris as a man with "an impressive record of public service from his earliest adulthood in the Army, and to the present day."
But the judge added: "My regretful conclusion is that no arguable error of law is to be discerned in any of Mr Morris's grounds for seeking judicial review, either in the magistrates' court or the crown court."
There had been "nothing equivocal" about his guilty plea, said the judge.
Although the loss of his door-to-door transport was no doubt "extremely inconvenient" and "rather depressing" for him, it did not justify allowing him to avoid the ban on grounds of "exceptional hardship".
Mr Morris was praised for his courtesy in presenting his case - and he in turn thanked the judges for their "very fair" handling of his application.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments