Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Deportee's cancer death 'on Britain's conscience'

Law Editor,Robert Verkaik
Friday 21 March 2008 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The treatment of Ama Sumani, a terminally ill cancer patient who was forcibly taken from her hospital bed and deported to Ghana, had already been described as a uniquely barbaric act.

Her death, just hours after her friends in Wales had raised enough money to fly her back to the UK for emergency care, has shamed Britain's immigration system and provoked outrage. Doctors, human rights groups and senior members of the clergy said yesterday that there was an urgent need to end the removal of very sick, failed asylum-seekers.

The Archbishop of Wales, Dr Barry Morgan, said the death of Ms Sumani, 39, who had two children, was now on the nation's conscience. Ms Sumani's friend Janet Simmons said she had tried to contact Ms Sumani to tell her that the campaign to bring her back to Britain had raised £60,000, which would have been used to pay for private treatment in the UK.

Ms Simmons, who returned to Britain on Sunday from her friend's hospital bedside in Ghana, said: "I rang Ghana to tell her the good news and was told that she had died two hours before. She was just too tired to carry on and gave up."

She said a pharmaceutical company had agreed to supply the medication free of charge and that she was in the process of applying for an emergency visa for Ms Sumani's return. The money will now go towards paying for the funeral and to fund the education of her children, Mary, 16, and Samede, seven.

Dr Morgan said yesterday: "I believe her death is on the conscience of this nation because we deported her when it was against every humanitarian instinct to do so."

Ms Sumani moved to the UK five years ago to become a student but began working in contravention of her visa regulations.

She had been receiving dialysis three times a week in the UK after her kidneys were damaged by cancer but was forced to leave when her visa expired.

On 9 January five immigration officers arrived at the University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, where Ms Sumani was being treated for malignant myeloma. Against her will, they removed her in a wheelchair and drove her to Heathrow airport where she was flown back to Ghana, a country that could not afford to treat her condition.

The Home Office's actions were immediately condemned by Ms Sumani's supporters and attacked in an editorial in the respected medical journal The Lancet, which described the decision as "atrocious barbarism".

It was reported that British immigration officials who accompanied her to Accra, in Ghana, offered to pay for the first three months, £3,022, but the offer was rejected because Ms Sumani had no source of funds to continue treatment.

In an interview given after her return, Ms Sumani said that she did not know anyone in Accra as she was from the north of the country, where her family remain.

Lin Homer, the chief executive of the Border and Immigration Agency, said: "This is a sad case... The circumstances surrounding this case were not unique though. The case was carefully considered by both trained caseworkers but also through the independent judicial process, which is better and fairer than a decision by me... or by the minister."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in