Couple claim wrongful dismissal in UK's first 'caste bias' battle
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.An Indian couple who met at a UK law firm where they both worked are claiming wrongful dismissal because of discrimination by caste.
In the first case of its kind in the UK, the couple claim that the Coventry-based law firm Heer Manak Solicitors treated them differently after they married because they are from different castes.
Amardeep Begraj, 33, a former solicitor at the firm, hails from the higher caste of Jat, whereas her husband Vijay Begraj, 32, the former practice manager, belongs to the Dalits, also known as the 'untouchables'.
Ms Begraj told an employment tribunal in Birmingham that a senior colleague warned her against marrying Mr Begraj on the grounds that people of his caste were 'different creatures' and that his position in the firm was 'compromised'.
According to a report in The Times, Ms Begraj said she felt worried after hearing that her boss was involved in a gang that forced girls out of such relationships.
The partner in the law practice, Robin Heer allegedly once told her that he knew people who could do kneecappings.
Mrs Begraj said that her husband was told that Mr Heer would disapprove of their relationship because he had been involved in a gang that returned Jat girls in inter-caste relationships to their parents.
Andrew Marshall, acting for Heer Manak, said that Mr Heer denied the allegation.
Mrs Begraj was asked why the couple invited to their wedding all the senior lawyers against whom they were now claiming discrimination. She told the tribunal that she did not want to antagonise their bosses by not inviting them when other work colleagues had been invited.
The case comes as Home Secretary Theresa May considers whether to amend British equality law to include protection to those discriminated by caste.
Mr Begraj, who worked for the firm for seven years, was fired last year. His wife resigned in January.
The tribunal continues.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments