Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Council tenants may be forced to downsize

Tom Morgan,Press Association
Wednesday 28 July 2010 10:13 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Council house tenants in properties bigger than they need could be forced to move into smaller accommodation under the Government's austerity drive.

Ministers vowed to make the "absurd" housing benefit system fairer, with housing swaps potentially affecting hundreds of thousands of people.

A total of 234,000 households in the social tenant sector are overcrowded while 456,000 are under-occupied, meaning people have more than one extra spare room, according to official figures.

Welfare reform minister Lord Freud said: "We cannot continue with this absurd situation where some of our poorest families have to live in overcrowded conditions while others are subsidised to live in big homes with plenty of spare room.

"It's not fair on those families struggling to get by and it's not fair on the taxpayer.

"That's why, after the benefits free-for-all of the last decade, we are putting fairness back at the heart of the system."

More than three million tenants - 70% of housing benefit recipients - live in the social sector at an annual cost of well over £12 billion.

A Work and Pensions Department spokeswoman said: "From April 2013, we will restrict housing benefit for working age tenants in the social rented sector. This will apply where people live in a property that is too large for their needs.

"We will work with local authorities to ensure that the housing is more sensibly allocated and that entitlement to social housing reflects family size."

The move is likely to prove controversial for older couples who have lived in council houses for decades since their children have left home.

But the spokeswoman added: "Specific policy detail is yet to be agreed but the principle would be that working age housing benefit claimants who are living in a property that is too large for their household size will have their benefit capped."

Almost one million people will see their housing benefit cut by an average of £12 a week next year, it emerged earlier this week.

The British Property Federation (BPF) warned ministers the cuts would lead to "ghettos" and social problems as claimants struggle to find affordable homes.

In his emergency Budget, Chancellor George Osborne said housing benefit payments would be limited to £280 a week for a flat and £400 a week for a house.

The new caps were needed, he said, because the cost of payments had risen 50% to £21 billion over the last decade.

The BPF, which represents property developers and owners, fund managers, investment banks and housing organisations, said the cuts would lead to "real-life personal tragedies".

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in