Close legal loophole which means public services contractors don't have disclose their work, say campaigners
Vital information about prison attacks, penalty fares on London trains, NHS whistleblowing policies in the NHS and parking tickets has all been withheld
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Companies who operate everything from prisons to parking services and prosecuting TV licence evaders must be made more accountable, campaigners say.
A legal loophole in the Freedom of Information Act which exempts major contractors from revealing details of the public services they provide must be closed, they say.
Vital information about prison attacks, penalty fares on London trains, NHS whistleblowing policies in the NHS and parking tickets has all been withheld under the Freedom of Information (FOI) Act because this information was held by public authority contractors and not by the authorities themselves.
The Campaign for Freedom of Information say currently under the FoI Act, information held by contractors can normally only be obtained if the contract specifically entitles the authority employing them to it.
If the contract is silent, the information cannot be accessed.
Maurice Frankel, the Campaign’s director said: “Information about public services provided by contractors, whether commercial bodies or charities, should be covered by FoI. The loophole in the Act, which excludes such information if the contract doesn’t refer to it, should be closed. The public’s right to know should not be arbitrarily cut off because the staff who provide the service are paid by a contractor, not by the authority itself.”
The Campaign has highlighted 10 examples of information about public services withheld because of the loophole.
Withheld information includes
• The number of complaints from the public against court security officers provided by G4S and the number of officers charged with offences.
• the number of prison staff at HMP Birmingham and the number of attacks at the prison. Also held only by G4S.
• the ratio of prison officers to prisoners at Liverpool’s HMP Altcourse, managed by G4S.
• information about rehabilitation projects at HMP Bronzefield, near Ashfield in Surrey run by Sodexo.
• the value of penalty fares issued on the London Overground and Docklands Light Railway by private sector inspectors.
• the costs of bringing TV licensing prosecutions, which is held by Capita and not known to the BBC.
• whistleblowing policies applying to Virgin Care staff providing NHS services.
• the numbers of parking tickets issued, then cancelled on appeal, by Islington traffic wardens offered Argos points as incentives to issue tickets by NCP Ltd.
• how often a contractor managed council swimming pool in Southwark had been needlessly closed to the public after being booked by schools which did not use their slots.
• arrangements made by a subcontractor to restore Leyton Marsh after its use as a temporary basketball court during the Olympics.
The Campaign have called for major contractors, whose work mainly involves providing public services, to be brought directly under the Act in their own right in relation to those contracts. Information held by other contractors should be available via an FOI request to the public authority, it says. This approach has been endorsed by the Information Commissioner.
The Public Accounts Committee has recommended that “Freedom of information should be extended to private companies providing public services” and that “where private companies provide public services funded by the taxpayer, those areas of their business which are publicly funded should be subject to the Freedom of Information Act provision”.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments