Baroness Hale says women in veils should remove them when giving evidence in court
The senior judge said that seeing faces could be 'important' and 'necessary' when women were testifying
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Britain’s most senior female judge has said that women in veils should be compelled to show their faces when giving evidence in court.
Baroness Hale, deputy president of the Supreme Court, told the Evening Standard that ways have "got to be found" to ensure that face coverings are removed for key parts of court hearings. She added that there "must come a point" at which judges insist veils are lifted.
She said that seeing faces could be "important" and "necessary" when women were testifying and on other occasions, such as when the issue of identity was at stake.
Last year Rebekah Dawson refused to remove her niqab during her trial for witness intimidation. The judge in the case told Dawson — later jailed for six months after pleading guilty — that she would have to show her face if giving evidence.
The Lord Chief Justice responded to the case by vowing to publish guidelines on the issue. But Lady Hale made clear she feels the rules must require veils be removed at critical points in court.
"We don’t object to allowing people to do things for sincerely held religious reasons if they don’t do any harm. If it does harm, we have to be a bit tougher," she said.
Lady Hale said it might be possible to "accommodate" a woman’s religious beliefs by the use of screens.
"There are other situations, not only giving evidence, when it's necessary to be able to recognise people and identify people. If it's necessary to see their face then ways have got to be found to allow that to happen."