Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Baby circumcised without mother's consent in Nottingham: 'His nappy was covered in blood'

'I opened the nappy and I ended up having to leave the room because I felt hysterical'

Samuel Osborne
Thursday 29 June 2017 07:24 BST
Comments
Dr Balvinder Mehat works at the Bakersfield Medical Centre in Nottingham
Dr Balvinder Mehat works at the Bakersfield Medical Centre in Nottingham (Googlemaps)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A mother has described the moment she opened her baby son's nappy to discover he had been circumcised without her consent.

"I opened the nappy and I ended up having to leave the room because I felt hysterical," the mother, from Nottingham, said in an interview with the BBC.

"It was just awful really, it wasn't very nice, there was all blood there and stuff."

Her son was circumcised when he was three years old in July 2013, as he was staying with his Muslim paternal grandparents.

Although she complained to Nottinghamshire Police, the force initially concluded there was insufficient evidence to bring a criminal prosecution.

However, she later got help from the anti-circumcision group Men do Complain and Saimo Chalal QC, a leading human rights lawyer.

Male circumcision is legal in the UK only if both parents consent.

But the mother believes it amounts to "male genital mutilation" (MGM) and should be viewed in the same way as female genital mutilation (FGM).

"It's even illegal to dock dogs' tails. I've come home crying my eyes out thinking a dog has got more rights than my child," she told the broadcaster.

"There's something seriously not right with it all. You can protect a dog, you can protect a girl, but not a boy."

The woman said her son had suffered recurring infections in the years since the circumcision.

She said: "It looks like he's been half circumcised is the only way to describe it. There's half the skin, it's not all the way over.

"It swells up, it gets red and a little bit sore in places."

After a letter from Ms Chahal, police reopened the investigation and arrested three suspects.

Dr Belvinder Mehat, of the Bakersfield Medical Centre, was arrested on suspicion of causing grievous bodily harm with intent.

Also arrested was a 44-year-old man and a 47-year-old woman, believed to be the boy's paternal grandparents, who were held on suspicion of conspiracy to commit grievous bodily harm.

All three suspects have been released pending further investigation, police said.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in