Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Hillsborough victim died 'accidentally': Coroner says withdrawal of treatment not to blame

Malcolm Pithers,Northern Correspondent
Wednesday 22 December 1993 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

TONY BLAND, the young football fan who became the 96th victim of the Hillsborough football disaster, died accidentally, and not because medical treatment was withdrawn from him four years after the tragedy, an inquest concluded.

At a resumed inquest into his death in Bradford yesterday, the West Yorkshire coroner, James Turnbull, returned a verdict of accidental death due to traumatic asphyxia on Mr Bland, 22, consistent with his being crushed at the Hillsborough disaster.

Mr Bland had remained in a persistent vegetative state at the Airedale hospital in Keighley, virtually from the time of the disaster on 15 April 1989, until his death in March this year. He never recovered from the injury he suffered at the Sheffield ground, although he was able to breath unaided.

The Airedale hospital trust, with the full backing and blessing of Tony Bland's parents, Allan, 58 and Barbara, 55, applied to the High Court for a ruling that it would not be unlawful for medical treatment to be withdrawn from him. After a lengthy legal process through the High Court and the Court of Appeal, five Law Lords ruled in February this year that doctors were within their legal rights to withdraw medical treatment. This was done and Mr Bland died shortly afterwards, on 3 March.

Because of the unusual circumstances of Mr Bland's injury and his eventual death, the case caused considerable controversy, not least from pro-life groups.

Yesterday, Father James Morrow, a pro-life campaigner from Braemar, Scotland, who attempted to bring a private prosecution for murder after Mr Bland's death, was refused permission to question witnesses at the inquest by Mr Turnbull.

The coroner did hear evidence from the police officer who gave Tony Bland mouth-to-mouth resuscitation, two of his friends who went to the ground with him and survived, and detailed medical evidence from the consultant, Dr Jim Howe, who cared for him until his death. Dr Howe said yesterday that when Tony Bland was transferred from Sheffield to the Airedale hospital he was 'deeply unconscious'. He said it was clear then that he was in a persistent vegetative state.

Dr Howe was asked whether there was a chance of a patient making a recovery from PVS, to which he replied: 'There is . . . but usually in the first few months. To my knowledge there are no cases of good recovery after a year.' Dr Howe said he had discussed the possibility of withdrawing treatment, essentially feeding tubes and drugs, with the Bland family and the South Yorkshire coroner. He had been advised that he might be liable to prosecution and that the practice had not been legally tested. The Airedale hospital trust then took the matter to the High Court.

Mr Bland's father, Allan, said he had been at home watching the match on television and had, he thought, spotted his son caught up in the disaster. He agreed that the application to the High Court to withdraw treatment for his son had been done with his 'full knowledge and acquiescence'.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in