Phone firms dispute Met's hacking role
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Britain's biggest mobile phone networks yesterday denied claims by a senior police officer that Scotland Yard had "ensured" that the operators contacted all potential victims of voicemail hacking.
Vodafone, O2 and Orange/T-Mobile told MPs that they had not been asked by the Metropolitan Police to inform customers whose messages appeared to have been eavesdropped by Glenn Mulcaire, a private detective working for the News of the World.
The statement appears to contradict testimony to Parliament by Assistant Commissioner John Yates that "all reasonable steps" had been taken to pass on a warning to 126 likely victims of hacking.
Senior representatives of the big four networks yesterday insisted there had been no such contact with the Yard. Vodafone and Orange/T-Mobile revealed they were still waiting for a reply to letters sent to police in November last year asking for a list of customers to inform about phone hacking.
Responding to the evidence of the phone companies, the Metropolitan Police said that Mr Yates, who was in charge of a 2009 re-examination of the phone-hacking scandal which found there was no grounds for a new investigation, had acknowledged in previous evidence to MPs that more should have been done to inform victims of phone hacking and it was reviewing its correspondence with phone companies.