Canalettos go on show at Palace: Masterpieces that escaped the Windsor Castle fire are to be exhibited. Dalya Alberge reports
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.CANALETTO masterpieces that narrowly escaped the fire at Windsor Castle last November go on show tomorrow in the Queen's Gallery at Buckingham Palace.
Although the debate about improving access to the Royal Collection continues to rage, with one source estimating that 80 per cent of the paintings have not been seen by the public (beyond photographic reproductions), the exhibition is not a response to the criticisms.
It is the latest in a series of annual displays which have been held at the Queen's Gallery since the early 1960s and visited by 4.9 million people. However, Jane Roberts, a curator of the Royal Collection, pointed out the irony of the art world's criticism. With some 10,000 pictures, enamels and miniatures, 20,000 drawings, 30,000 watercolours and 500,000 prints, she asked, how much does the public want to see? She said that even though Leonardo and Michelangelo were among Italian Old Master drawings exhibited between August and December, less than 100 people visited each day.
She said that loans were seldom turned down. Christopher Lloyd, surveyor of the Queen's pictures, added that Vermeer's Lady at the Virginals, included in the latest display, 'goes in and out' for loans so often, 'Buckingham Palace is like its hotel'.
The exhibition focuses on some of the finest paintings and drawings purchased by George III in 1762 from Joseph Smith, British Consul in Venice, who befriended Canaletto, Sebastiano Ricci and many of the great Venetian artists of the day.
Smith was so active in supplying English and European collectors with works of art, he was dubbed the 'Merchant of Venice' by Horace Walpole.
Although London newspapers of 1762 could not have been more accurate when they reported that the purchase would 'make the finest Collection in Europe', George III was less interested in Canaletto, Carracci and Castiglione than in Smith's library of tens of thousands of books and manuscripts. The pictures came with the pounds 20,000 deal.
Although George III sold a few of them in the 1790s, and much of the library was given to the British Museum, in 1823 by George IV, the bulk of Smith's pictures remained in the Royal Collection.
The Palace has emphasised on many occasions that the Queen would not be able to follow their example: she is curator and trustee of the Royal Collection.
A jewel-like miniature, once thought to be a portrait of Shakespeare, sold at Christie's yesterday for pounds 177,500 - more than pounds 100,000 over its top estimate. It broke the record for the artist, Nicholas Hilliard (1547-1619). It was bought by a private buyer.
(Photograph omitted)
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments