Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

UK to review involvement of Huawei in Oxfordshire cybersecurity centre, as firm denies spying claims

Review follows a report from the UK's Intelligence and Security Committee that raised security fears over influence of the Chinese government

James Vincent
Friday 19 July 2013 06:52 BST
Comments
2013A man looks at a Huawei mobile phone as he shops at an electronic market in Shanghai January 22, 2013. REUTERS/Carlos Barria
2013A man looks at a Huawei mobile phone as he shops at an electronic market in Shanghai January 22, 2013. REUTERS/Carlos Barria

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The UK Government has announced plans to investigate the involvement of Chinese firm Huawei in the construction of a British cybersecurity base in Oxfordshire.

Huawei, the world’s second largest telecoms equipment manufacturer, have previously come under fire from US politicians because of the firm’s links to the Chinese government and military. It was founded in 1987 by Ren Zhengfei, a former officer in the People’s Liberation Army.

Concerns were first raised after the UK’s Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) published a critical report last month, urging the government to review security at the base, known as the Cell.

"While we recognise that there are some benefits associated with the current staffing arrangements for the Cell, these do not, in our opinion, outweigh the risks of Huawei effectively policing themselves," read the report.

It continued by suggesting that national security was being jeopardised because of the government’s fears of losing trade with Beijing.

George Osborne responded to the ISC report by stating that his priority was to boost trade, also drawing attention to the opening of a new Huawei office in Reading as a sign of a strong relationship between China and the UK.

Huawei themselves have welcomed the review, saying “Huawei shares the same goal as the UK government and the ISC (Intelligence and Security Committee of parliament) in raising the standards of cyber security in the UK.”

The company has denied having any close connections to the Chinese state, pointing to its 98.6% ownership by its employees as evidence of its independence.

Huawei has been denied major government contracts in the US following a congressional report last October that suggesting the company, along with ZTE, was a security threat.

However, the Chinese telecoms giant have had a steady presence in the UK since winning a multi-billion pound bit to supply equipment to BT in 2005.

The review of Huawei’s involvement will be carried out by National Security Advisor Kim Darroch. A spokesperson for the Cabinet Office has said: "We take threats to our critical national infrastructure very seriously and need to be responsive to changes in a fast-moving and complex, globalised telecommunications marketplace.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in