Women at the heart of intelligence debate
Your support helps us to tell the story
Our mission is to deliver unbiased, fact-based reporting that holds power to account and exposes the truth.
Whether $5 or $50, every contribution counts.
Support us to deliver journalism without an agenda.
Louise Thomas
Editor
Women are responsible for the wider intelligence of the human race – but men push it forward, a new genetics theory suggests.
Women are responsible for the wider intelligence of the human race – but men push it forward, a new genetics theory suggests.
Building on data which implies that some of the genes for intelligence are located on the female X chromosome, two German researchers argue that mutations of men's single X chromosome would increase intelligence. And they claim that women who found such men attractive would then mate and spread that useful mutation.
By preferring bright men, according to the theory published today in New Scientist magazine, women would have driven human evolution forwards towards higher intelligence at an accelerating rate.
It is this sexual selection process, running hand in hand with the survival benefits of intelligence, that has resulted in a threefold increase in human brain volume in 2.5 million years, say Horst Hameister and Ulrich Zechner, from the University of Ulm.
Crucial to proving the theory is showing that intelligence genes are unusually numerous on the X chromosome. The scientists claim to have found just such a pattern.
However, Steven Rose, the eminent professor of biology and director of the Brain and Behaviour Research Group at the Open University, is one of the dissenters in the field.
He sees no evidence for what he describes as the "completely pathetic argument" that big brains are the product of women lusting after men who painted caves.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments