Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Type of ink blamed for the destruction of historic documents

Charles Arthur
Thursday 12 September 2002 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Curators around the world are struggling to prevent the destruction of tens of thousands of historical books and manuscripts, including sketches by Leonardo da Vinci and Rembrandt, handwritten music by Bach and Handel and the American Constitution. The documents are under attack from an unusual source: the ink used to write them.

A recent survey suggested that 80 per cent of European archives are affected by the unfortunate paradox of iron-gall ink, which is slowly eating away the work it was meant to record. The British Library, which is trying to preserve rare work from Roman times to first drafts by Dickens, is gravely concerned about the problem.

"It takes several hundred years for something to be completely eroded," said David Jacobs, a senior conservator who has been at the British Library since 1982, and in conservation for more than 30 years. "But before that it becomes increasingly fragile, so you can't lend it out."

Iron-gall ink was used by the Romans and produces the characteristic black familiar on manuscripts dating back hundreds of years. It was favoured over carbon-based inks because it would "bite" into the page, and could not be washed off. That made it a favourite for official documents, including the American Constitution, because it was proof against forgery. But, the ink's constituents – extract of gall nuts mixed with gum arabic and iron sulphate – contain the secret of the documents' destruction. New Scientist magazine, which highlights the risk to book collections today, warns: "Open an old book and disconnected letters can fall into your lap, the paper a lace doily with a mass of sentence-shaped holes."

The reason is that the iron in the ink reacts with the air over time to produce oxygen radicals – highly reactive individual atoms of oxygen that will react with anything they touch. At the surface of the manuscript a chain reaction breaks cellulose down into smaller molecules with the result that the paper yellows and becomes brittle. Ink rich in iron sulphate makes the paper break down faster. The problem is worst in music manuscripts, explained Mr Jacobs, because "musicians were constantly making changes, which means more ink on the page."

The British Library, together with organisations around the world, is seeking ways to stop or at least slow down the reactions. And the good news is that there may be a solution – literally.

Two scientists from the Institute for Cultural Heritage in Amsterdam have developed a system which bathes the affected pages in a solution of phytate, a natural antioxidant from seeds, which is used to treat cancer. The phytate works by reacting with molecules that would otherwise react with oxygen to produce free radicals, which inside a human cell can cause cancer, but on a page rots it.

"This is the only thing that seems to stabilise the iron," said Mr Jacobs. "It seems the best option at the moment."

Elmer Eusman, senior paper conservator for the US Library of Congress, said: "It's a very elegant method. It doesn't make a coloured solution, it doesn't attack the ink itself – it has a lot going for it."

The phytate is still being tested. None of the archives has yet been treated with it.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in