Study group spends £40,000 on proving that a hangover hurts
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.But this is no fantasy. Academics at Glasgow Caledonian University spent £40,000 proving that hangovers make you feel tired and impede concentration.
Some people found the study anything but amusing, accusing the Government quango concerned of wasting taxpayers' money.
Margaret Davidson, the chief executive of the Scottish Patients Association, a health campaign group, said: "This is a waste of public money that could be better spent on research to help people with alcohol problems."
The academics were given the grant by the Alcohol Education and Research Council (AERC) to research "whether having an alcohol-induced hangover impairs psychomotor and cognitive performance".
Seventy students were recruited; half were told to go out and enjoy themselves while the rest were ordered to maintain sobriety. The next morning they were asked to perform a variety of simple tasks. Unsurprisingly, the volunteers with hangovers performed worse than those who had not been drinking. They were also more likely to feel tired, had difficulty concentrating and couldn't drive as well. There was, however, no difference between the groups in short-term memory tests.
Dr Frances Finnigan, the psychologist who led the study, said: "Ours was a naturalistic hangover study while most research is carried out in laboratories."
The AERC was unavailable for comment, but Jack Law, the chief executive of Alcohol Focus Scotland, insisted the work was important as it "provides scientific evidence for what we know anecdotally".
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments