Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Solar System loses a planet after experts reject Pluto

Steve Connor
Friday 25 August 2006 01:11 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Pluto lost its status as a full planet yesterday when astronomers voted to reclassify it as a "dwarf planet", leaving eight "classical planets" in the Solar System.

The International Astronomical Union threw out a resolution that would have increased the number of planets in the solar system to 12 - and instead opted for a tighter definition that eliminated Pluto.

Delegates to the IAU's meeting in Prague drew a clear distinction between the eight classical planets, most of which were known since antiquity, and the much smaller Pluto, which was only discovered in 1930. From now on, the planets will be restricted to Mercury, Earth, Jupiter, Saturn, Neptune, Venus, Mars and Uranus.

Just a week ago leaders of the IAU had proposed placing it in a sub-category known as "Plutons". This idea proved so unpopular that it was dropped. The scientists said that Pluto should from now on be considered a dwarf planet along with two other smaller celestial bodies - Ceres and UB313 - that orbit the Sun.

The scientists agreed that to be called a planet, a celestial body must be in orbit around a star while not itself being a star. It also must be large enough in mass for its own gravity to pull it into a nearly spherical shape and have cleared the neighbourhood around its orbit.

This last clause, which was added to the definition, meant that Pluto was disqualified because its oblong orbit overlaps with the orbit of Neptune.

The new definition - the first time the IAU has tried to define scientifically what a planet is - means a second category called "dwarf planets" has been created, and a third for all other objects, except satellites, known as "small solar system bodies".

Asteroids have been loosely referred to as "minor planets" but are now classed as small solar system bodies.

Charon, the largest of Pluto's three moons, had been included among the "Plutons", since some experts regard it as a twin planet. However, it is no longer being given any special status.

The need to define what it takes to be a planet was driven by technological advances that enable astronomers to look further into space and to measure more precisely the size of celestial bodies in our solar system.

Professor Ron Ekers, president of the IAU, said: "Modern science provides much more knowledge than the simple fact that objects orbiting the Sun appear to move with respect to the background of fixed stars. For example, recent new discoveries have been made of objects in the outer regions of our solar system that have sizes comparable to and larger than Pluto. These discoveries have called into question whether or not they should be considered as new 'planets'."

Astronomers were divided after a team led by Professor Mike Brown at the California Institute of Technology discovered a planet larger than Pluto, UB313, nicknamed "Xena" after the Warrior Princess TV series.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in