Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Scientists crack riddle of why lobsters turn red in the pot

Chris Gray
Tuesday 30 July 2002 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A riddle that has perplexed cooks for years has finally been solved: scientists have explained why lobsters turn red when they are boiled.

Diners with a vegetarian conscience will be pleased to learn that the colour change has nothing to do with the lobsters being scorched .

The question was first posed by the Nobel prize-winning biologist George Wald in the 1940s. Four teams of British scientists from Imperial College, London, Manchester University, Daresbury Laboratory in Cheshire and Royal Holloway University of London, now claim to have found the answer after a seven-year study.

They identified the structure of beta-crustacyanin, a key part of shell protein. When it is cooked, its structure changes and bends the shape of a colour molecule called astaxanthin, which is normally bound to it. As astaxanthin is released from its bounds, it turns from blue to red, according to the research published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in