Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Scientists at war over who should run Royal Institute

Ousted leader Lady Greenfield may return after squabbling among factions

Health Editor,Jeremy Laurance
Monday 12 April 2010 00:00 BST
Comments
(DAVID SANDISON)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

She is a charismatic scientist, a gifted communicator and a flamboyant dresser with a taste for crimson leather jackets. As the first female director of the Royal Institution, the world's oldest independent scientific research body, Baroness Susan Greenfield promised dynamic new leadership and a successful future. Now she could be its last.

Warfare has broken out at the 200-year-old institution which votes today on a proposal to dismiss the entire current council and replace it with supporters of Lady Greenfield, who was made redundant from her post in January following cost overruns.

Her opponents have warned that the no-confidence vote is "unprecedented in legal history" and that if it is won it could lead to the institution's demise. Sponsors are said to fear that replacing the entire council would create instability. One is reported to be preparing to withdraw funding.

What started as a row over one woman's post has developed into a battle between rival factions within the scientific elite. Lady Greenfield accuses the RI of sexism – "I was unfairly dismissed. I am female and it is my contention that a man would not have been treated in the same way," she told the BBC on Friday. She has threatened to file an employment tribunal claim against the organisation.

The RI said it had made her redundant because its "requirements for the functions for the role of director as currently defined has ceased to exist".

The RI is £2.5m in debt and has annual losses of £1.75m after spending £22m on the refurbishment of its London headquarters in Albemarle Street, Mayfair, including an upmarket restaurant and bar, masterminded by Lady Greenfield. The work was funded by selling off property that had provided an income for the Institution.

A 21-page document sent to the 2,600 members by the trustees urges them to reject the no-confidence resolution and warns that, if passed, it could further destabilise the organisation and worsen its financial crisis.

Chris Rofe, the Institution's chief executive, said: "The Royal Institution is now well-positioned to capitalise on the benefits of the refurbished premises and the drive, skill and creativity of its staff. This positive momentum will not be helped by such combative manoeuvres... and the inevitable instability this process creates."

But supporters of Lady Greenfield, who include Professor Lisa Jardine, chair of the Human Fertilistation Authority, Lord Julian Hunt, former head of the Met Office and Miriam Stoppard, writer and broadcaster, are unmoved.

Professor Jardine told a newspaper yesterday that Lady Greenfield could win between £500,000 and £1m at tribunal. "That would only exacerbate the Institution financial crisis. The present council... are a funny boxed-in clique and we are trying to free the institution from their influence."

The dissident members say their priority is to improve the governance and finances of the institution rather than to re-instate Lady Greenfield. Critics have questioned the value of having a celebrity director who is not able to pull in much-needed finance while supporters worry that without a prominent figurehead the institution may be doomed.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in