Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Polar bear penises are getting weaker

Poor polar bears just can't catch a break

Rachel Feltman
Tuesday 27 January 2015 14:36 GMT
Comments
A polar bear’s diet is rich in seal blubber and half of its own body weight is composed of fat
A polar bear’s diet is rich in seal blubber and half of its own body weight is composed of fat (PA)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

It's already been shown that the sex organs of polar bears have been shrinking over time, and now it seems that the bones inside their penises are growing weaker as well.

In a new study published in Environmental Research, scientists examined samples of the penis bone — a bone called the baculum that allows some mammals to have longer, more successful mating sessions — to see if environmental pollutants might be effecting their density. They focused on a type of industrial contaminant called polychlorinated biphenyls, or PCBs.

“These chemicals enter the atmosphere at lower latitudes where they were used, and are then deposited down from the cold polar air, so Arctic animals are more highly exposed than animals in more temperate or equatorial regions,” University of Florida researcher Margaret James (who wasn't involved in the study) told New Scientist.

Sure enough, the authors of the new study found a link between high levels of PCBs and low baculum density. The researchers can't be sure that PCBs are to blame, but this isn't the first indication that they could be causing serious trouble. In fact, the once-widely used chemicals were banned by the United Nations in 2011.

Used to create different kinds of plastics and rubbers during the 20th century, these compounds have proven difficult to remove from the environment since their ban. They remain stuck to sediments and are carried through waterways, building up in concentration (and toxicity) the higher up you go in the food chain. For top predators, such as humans and polar bears, the effects can be dire — we consume all of the PCBs the animals we eat have stored in their body fat, and that adds up.

In humans, PCBs have been linked to all kinds of ailments. Increased risk of cancer is the largest concern, but studies have suggested that PCBs can cause developmental and behavioral problems as well.

But polar bears are already in serious danger of going extinct, so if PCBs are making it even more difficult for them to reproduce, we've got a major problem on our hands.

And researchers worry that the effects of climate change and industrial pollution may be magnifying each other: Climate change leads to food scarcity, which makes polar bears skinnier. And if they've got less body mass, then smaller doses of environmental pollutants will be enough to cut off their reproductive chances.

© Washington Post

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in