People who are arrogant get better grades, US personality researchers claim
But researchers find that intellectually arrogant people are rated lower for leadership and agreeableness by others
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.If you arrogantly think you are pretty clever, it turns out you might just be right.
Research by personality experts has suggested that admitting you are intellectually arrogant goes hand-in-hand with good academic achievement - suggesting that being aware of your own knowledge helps you perform well in coursework and exams.
But those who score themselves high on intellectual arroagance are also seen as less good team players by their peers.
The researchers at Baylor and the University of Mary Hardin-Baylor had initially hypothesised that people who scored high on "intellectual humility" would score high on grades - before the results proved them wrong.
"One possibility is that people who view themselves as intellectually arrogant know what they know and that translates to increases in academic performance," said researcher Wade Rowatt, a professor of psychology and neuroscience at Baylor, in a press release.
The study involved 103 undergraduates who rated themselves and each other on a variety of characteristics after doing individual and group tasks.
How people saw themselves rarely correlated with how others viewed them, the research found. People generally found others to be intellectually arrogant if they also saw them as high in dominance, extroverted and wanting to be the centre of attention. They rated them arrogant if they "saw their ideas as superior to others" and were "close-minded".
People who were seen as "humble", meanwhile, scored higher for virtues such as competence, agreeableness and leadership.
The researchers added that groups weren't quick at reaching a consensus about different members of the group, but could with time. It was particularly difficult to draw conclusions about whether someone was intellectually humble - whereas it was easier to conclude that they were arrogant, the scientists said.
"If people are forming opinions about extraversion and someone talks a lot, it's easy to draw consensus about that person," said lead author Benjamin Meagher, now a visiting assistant professor at Franklin and Marshall College in Lancaster, Pennsylvania.
"But it's more challenging for groups to recognise what behavior reveals another person's humility, as opposed to simply being shy or unsure."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments