Dons' inventions belong to us, says Cambridge
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Cambridge University is risking a serious rift with some of its leading scientists over proposals to seize control of the rights to their academic work.
The plan, which would take effect in January, has provoked anger among researchers who are warning of "civil war".
The university's Research Policy Committee recommended last month that the university should "assert ownership" of any intellectual property generated by Cambridge researchers that was not otherwise licensed.
At present, the university is unusual in allowing its researchers to own the rights to their inventions. Almost all other British universities have some form of over-arching ownership of their staff's inventions. The practice is also normal in America.
But Dr Ross Anderson, an expert in cryptography and computing, predicted: "There will be civil war about this. There's no way that the science, technology and medicine researchers will take this lying down." He said there was evidence in the US that the Cambridge approach produced more inventive companies.
Dr David MacKay of the university's physics department, who has produced a number of pieces of software he makes available without charge, said: "I would be concerned if software couldn't be free and the university claimed ownership. I think that the academic community works well precisely because we share freely."
The proposals will be debated by staff later this year.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments